Is dictionary file masking being removed? - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: hashcat (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-45.html) +--- Thread: Is dictionary file masking being removed? (/thread-5901.html) |
Is dictionary file masking being removed? - Kgx Pnqvhm - 09-25-2016 Every so often I try one of the betas out of curiosity, but have noticed that for a long time dictionary file masking no longer works. (This is in Windows 7.) For as long as I've used the hashcats, when I have a directory of word lists by length, such as: . . . Len_10.txt Len_11.txt Len_12.txt . . . I've been able to specify a mask like *.txt to get them. But now, no matter how many variations of syntax I try, hashcat v3.10 beta xxx stops with error messages like this: E RROR: base\bylength\*.txt: No such file or directory But putting the rejected mask into the DOS command "dir" always finds the files. I'm not a part of the beta discussions, but is the ability to specify dictionary files masks being deliberately removed, or is this just a long-standing bug that was introduced but not yet fixed? RE: Is dictionary file masking being removed? - atom - 09-27-2016 No it should work. Probably related to refactoring, please open a github issue otherwise it's forgotten. |