+- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: hashcat (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-45.html)
+--- Thread: hashcat-3.10 slower then cudaHashcat-2.01 (/thread-5917.html)
hashcat-3.10 slower then cudaHashcat-2.01 - baltazarek - 10-02-2016
I replaced cudaHashcat-2.01 by hashcat-3.10 and the speed of cracking WPA2 is slower.
cudaHashcat-2.01:
Device #1: GeForce GTX 560 Ti, 1024MB, 1800Mhz, 8MCU
Speed.GPU.#1.: 38269 H/s
hashcat-3.10:
Device #1: GeForce GTX 560 Ti, 256/1024 MB allocatable, 8MCU
Speed.Dev.#1.: 26930 H/s (95.12ms)
Why is the speed slower ?
Thank you.
TOM
RE: hashcat-3.10 slower then cudaHashcat-2.01 - atom - 10-02-2016
Toi reduce deskopt lags and power consumption. If you want 2.01 speed, use -w 3
RE: hashcat-3.10 slower then cudaHashcat-2.01 - baltazarek - 10-02-2016
I tried:
hashcat64.exe -b -m 2500 -w 3
Speed.Dev.#1.: 26982 H/s (95.12ms)
The speed is not better. Where is the problem ?
RE: hashcat-3.10 slower then cudaHashcat-2.01 - kiara - 10-02-2016
try -w 4?
RE: hashcat-3.10 slower then cudaHashcat-2.01 - atom - 10-03-2016
Just noticed, the 560Ti is pre-maxwell card.