+- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: hashcat (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-45.html)
+--- Thread: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary (/thread-6084.html)
Pages:
1
2
Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary - DrDinosaur - 12-02-2016
I tried running this, but hashcat told me "ERROR: Use of rules-file or rules-generate only allowed in attack-mode 0."
.\hashcat64.exe -m 0 -a 6 -i -r .\rules\dive.rule hashes.txt dict.txt ?a?a
I can run the hybrid attack with my main word list, but what I would like to do is use dive.rule to create some new wordlist and then run the hybrid attack with that new word list (old word list with rules applied).
How can I accomplish this? I can use other tools if needed.
Thanks.
RE: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary - atom - 12-02-2016
you can do:
Quote:hashcat64 -a 6 dict.txt ?a?a -i --stdout | hashcat64 -m 0 -a 0 -r .\rules\dive.rule hashes.txt
RE: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary - DrDinosaur - 12-02-2016
(12-02-2016, 03:46 PM)atom Wrote: you can do:
Quote:hashcat64 -a 6 dict.txt ?a?a -i --stdout | hashcat64 -m 0 -a 0 -r .\rules\dive.rule hashes.txt
Thanks. Is it not possible to see the status of the command? I can't seem to view the status as normal.
RE: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary - atom - 12-02-2016
Yes, add --status --status-timer 1 to the 2nd
RE: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary - DrDinosaur - 12-02-2016
(12-02-2016, 07:50 PM)atom Wrote: Yes, add --status --status-timer 1 to the 2nd
That's helpful. Is it possible to get a time estimation as well?
RE: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary - atom - 12-02-2016
Not with stdin input, because hashcat can't know the number of candidates it will recieve via stdin.
RE: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary - DrDinosaur - 12-02-2016
(12-02-2016, 07:56 PM)atom Wrote: Not with stdin input, because hashcat can't know the number of candidates it will recieve via stdin.
Can you calculate the number of candidates beforehand and then use the speed (# hashes/s) to estimate a time to completion?
RE: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary - atom - 12-02-2016
Yes, that will work
RE: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary - DrDinosaur - 12-02-2016
(12-02-2016, 08:15 PM)atom Wrote: Yes, that will work
Ok, how can you figure out the number of candidates?
RE: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary - atom - 12-02-2016
number-of-words-in-wordlist1 * number-of-words-in-wordlist2 * number-of-rules