v3.30-49-g2f81532 segfault - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: hashcat (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-45.html) +--- Thread: v3.30-49-g2f81532 segfault (/thread-6250.html) |
v3.30-49-g2f81532 segfault - biatwc - 02-01-2017 Hi I've just cracked an LM hash and get a segfault when I do this: Code: ./hashcat -m 3000 --username --show --outfile-format 2 --potfile-path hashcat.potfile ../original_hash_file Code: ./hashcat -V original_hash_file: ive_changed_the_username:62c2efb7cb601def6b6db1d087ea9ba5 hashcat.potfile: 6b6db1d087ea9ba5:S?A 62c2efb7cb601def:F7R[E|P System: Linux laptop 3.19.0-79-generic #87-Ubuntu SMP Tue Dec 20 19:27:48 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Ubuntu Vivid (I think) Code: user@laptop:~/Downloads/hashcat$ ldd hashcat RE: v3.30-49-g2f81532 segfault - atom - 02-01-2017 Please try to reproduce with latest beta (88) and report back RE: v3.30-49-g2f81532 segfault - biatwc - 02-01-2017 (02-01-2017, 12:11 PM)atom Wrote: Please try to reproduce with latest beta (88) and report back Same output as before, I tried with master from git RE: v3.30-49-g2f81532 segfault - philsmd - 02-01-2017 If you use the git version you need to always do all of these steps: Code: $ make clean I also think that reports like this should be directly addressed on github, not here. Back to the problem... I can't reproduce: Code: $ cat original_hash_file RE: v3.30-49-g2f81532 segfault - biatwc - 02-01-2017 (02-01-2017, 12:40 PM)philsmd Wrote: If you use the git version you need to always do all of these steps: Hi, thanks for that. Just noticed this latop is end of life Ubuntu, I'll sort that out and try again, then post on github if it still happens. RE: v3.30-49-g2f81532 segfault - biatwc - 02-01-2017 (02-01-2017, 01:56 PM)biatwc Wrote:(02-01-2017, 12:40 PM)philsmd Wrote: If you use the git version you need to always do all of these steps: github issue here: https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/issues/1010 |