(Noob) Tips for a more efficient command? (Mode 2811) - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: hashcat (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-45.html) +--- Thread: (Noob) Tips for a more efficient command? (Mode 2811) (/thread-6277.html) |
(Noob) Tips for a more efficient command? (Mode 2811) - Raziel - 02-07-2017 I am trying to find a password which can only contain lowercase letters, uppercase letters and numbers, and its length can be between 6 and 12 characters. It's a mode 2811 (IPB) Can somebody help me with an efficient command for this? I have tried this: Code: hashcat64.exe -m 2811 -a 3 -w 3 --hex-charset -1 charsets/DES_full.charset -o example.dict example0.hash ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a --increment --increment-min 4 --increment-max 12 However the command above doesn't seem efficient because I am searching for symbols as well (and the password doesn't contain any symbol) Any advice is welcome RE: (Noob) Tips for a more efficient command? (Mode 2811) - rico - 02-07-2017 That command is all over the place! "--hex-charset" why? "-1 charsets/DES_full.charset"? You never use the -1 charset. "-o example.dict"? Outputting to a wordlist? "--increment-min 4"???? You just said the password length is between 6 and 12.... Dude. For the essence of what you're asking, your charset is: -1 ?l?u?d and then use ?1 for your mask: ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 And: --increment --increment-min 6 --increment-max 12 RE: (Noob) Tips for a more efficient command? (Mode 2811) - Raziel - 02-08-2017 rico, thanks a lot for the advice. Your reply really cleared up a few things in my head. My command looks like this now: Code: hashcat64.exe -a 3 -m 2811 -w 3 -i --increment-min=6 --increment-max=12 -1 ?l?u?d "hashfile" ?1?1?1?1?1?1 Also, am I outputting the cracked hashes right? (Nevermind. Noob me has just found out that they are written in a potfile) Is this ok? RE: (Noob) Tips for a more efficient command? (Mode 2811) - rico - 02-08-2017 Take a look at the mask in my post again. You also never mentioned what happened when you tried it. You tried it, right? |