![]() |
Hash Benchmark Much Slower Than Expected - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: hashcat (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-45.html) +--- Thread: Hash Benchmark Much Slower Than Expected (/thread-6927.html) |
Hash Benchmark Much Slower Than Expected - bpna - 10-10-2017 Hi, I am a newbie here, so please bear with me. After previewing this post I see the substitution for my Linux distribution and it made me chuckle. Any and all advice from people who know is awesome. I recently got a GTX1060 and set up The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well (Kali) Linux, then followed the instructions on here to get my drivers set up. If it's important, I am also dual-booting from a previous Windows install, followed these directions to get that set up. When I run Code: hashcat -b Code: hashcat (pull/1273/head) starting in benchmark mode... This differs significantly from what I found on this Hashcat Forum post, and I'm wondering if I've set something up wrong. The command Code: clinfo | grep -i "icd loader" The command Code: nvidia-smi -i 0 -q Code: ==============NVSMI LOG============== Code: Max Clocks Any other output I can get to be more helpful? Thanks for any and all help. Excited to crack some hashes RE: Hash Benchmark Much Slower Than Expected - Flomac - 10-10-2017 It seems to be almost exactly at half speed. Anything else running? Or a second thread? RE: Hash Benchmark Much Slower Than Expected - bpna - 10-10-2017 (10-10-2017, 02:56 AM)Flomac Wrote: It seems to be almost exactly at half speed. Anything else running? Or a second thread? This is a good insight, and I might not be checking correctly, but it appears nothing else is running. This is a fresh install of Linux on a machine set to dual-boot with Windows. Could Windows be doing anything with the card that I need to release? To confirm: I am powering on my machine, and in the GRUB bootloader choosing Linux, so I don't believe anything should be happening with Windows. ps shows Quote: PID TTY TIME CMD Code: nvidia-smi -i 0 -q Quote: Processes RE: Hash Benchmark Much Slower Than Expected - Chick3nman - 10-10-2017 What version of Hashcat are you using? RE: Hash Benchmark Much Slower Than Expected - undeath - 10-10-2017 @Chick3nman: -O has no influence on benchmark mode. My own 1060's results are similar to the one in the referenced benchmark (on 4.0.0-rc1). RE: Hash Benchmark Much Slower Than Expected - Chick3nman - 10-10-2017 You are correct, as tested in the other thread, thanks! Edited RE: Hash Benchmark Much Slower Than Expected - bpna - 10-11-2017 Hey Chick3nman, sorry for the late reply - just got home. hashcat -V shows Quote:pull/1273/head Would that be current? undeath how do I achieve your level of enlightenment? RE: Hash Benchmark Much Slower Than Expected - atom - 10-11-2017 The -O option has an influence in -b but only if -w is used RE: Hash Benchmark Much Slower Than Expected - bpna - 10-18-2017 I just wanted to update - I wiped The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well (Kali) and installed Ubuntu 16.04 and after getting NVIDIA drivers installed (and a brief period where I booted to a black screen and was able to get a TTY session after modifying a bootloader config file)... I am getting the KICKASS SPEEDS my GTX 1060 is capable of!!! hashcat (4.0.0-rc6) starting in benchmark mode... Benchmarking uses hand-optimized kernel code by default. You can use it in your cracking session by setting the -O option. Note: Using optimized kernel code limits the maximum supported password length. To disable the optimized kernel code in benchmark mode, use the -w option. * Device #1: WARNING! Kernel exec timeout is not disabled. This may cause "CL_OUT_OF_RESOURCES" or related errors. To disable the timeout, see: https://hashcat.net/q/timeoutpatch nvmlDeviceSetPowerManagementLimit(): Insufficient Permissions OpenCL Platform #1: NVIDIA Corporation ====================================== * Device #1: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 1517/6071 MB allocatable, 10MCU Benchmark relevant options: =========================== * --optimized-kernel-enable Hashmode: 900 - MD4 Speed.Dev.#1.....: 20345.0 MH/s (65.92ms) Hashmode: 0 - MD5 Speed.Dev.#1.....: 11645.2 MH/s (57.57ms) Hashmode: 5100 - Half MD5 Speed.Dev.#1.....: 7756.5 MH/s (86.47ms) Hashmode: 100 - SHA1 Speed.Dev.#1.....: 4422.0 MH/s (75.83ms) Hashmode: 1400 - SHA-256 Speed.Dev.#1.....: 1659.2 MH/s (50.31ms) Hashmode: 10800 - SHA-384 Speed.Dev.#1.....: 552.7 MH/s (75.83ms) ... Thanks everyone |