![]() |
Potfile entries and output file - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: hashcat (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-45.html) +--- Thread: Potfile entries and output file (/thread-7361.html) |
Potfile entries and output file - magikh0e - 03-12-2018 If I have a large potfile of previously cracked hashes, and cracking on some more hashes while outputing to a file. Will the hashes found inside the potfile be added to the output file automatically? It seems to be removing the hashes from the file of hashes being cracked on currently, however not adding them into the output file. Is this the expected behavior or am I understanding it wrong? Please advise. Thx RE: Potfile entries and output file - magikh0e - 03-12-2018 Also, why is the potfile not being exported when issuing the following command: hashcat64.bin -m 100 --show -o hashes.txt Usage: hashcat64.exe [options]... hash|hashfile|hccapxfile [dictionary|mask|directory]... Try --help for more help. RE: Potfile entries and output file - philsmd - 03-12-2018 yeah, it's exactly how it was designed. If the hashes are already present within the pot file it means that they were also already outputted somehow, therefore there is no need to do it again and again. you need to specify the hash file if you can --show Code: hashcat64.bin -m 100 --show -o output_file.txt hash.txt RE: Potfile entries and output file - magikh0e - 03-12-2018 What if you don't have the orignal hashfile anymore because the --remove option was used? RE: Potfile entries and output file - philsmd - 03-12-2018 In some cases you could just extract some lines from the potfile itself (like "cat hashcat.potfile"), but this is not a good idea in general. It's always advisable to keep all the original files RE: Potfile entries and output file - magikh0e - 03-12-2018 (03-12-2018, 10:50 PM)philsmd Wrote: In some cases you could just extract some lines from the potfile itself (like "cat hashcat.potfile"), but this is not a good idea in general. Boo, thx for the reply. Looks like I'll have to reparse up the original 22gb of hashes to make sure my output isn't missing anything. |