+- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: hashcat (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-45.html)
+--- Thread: Advanced combination attack rule (/thread-7425.html)
Advanced combination attack rule - CUwindows00 - 04-06-2018
Hello everyone
Ask a question of hashcat rules
Why do not many combination rules have such a rule?
Swap location attack rule
For example:
cat 1.txt
abc
cat 2.txt
123
cat 3.txt
!@#$
I think this rule is advanced and effective.
Hashcat does not have such a rule
The 3 combination attack rule generation should be the result of the following dictionary
abc123!@#$
abc!@#$123
123abc!@#$
123!@#$abc
!@#$123abc
!@#$abc123
RE: Why do not many combination rules have such a rule? - undeath - 04-06-2018
put all words in one dict and use combinator3 from hashcat-utils
RE: Why do not many combination rules have such a rule? - CUwindows00 - 04-06-2018
(04-06-2018, 09:30 AM)undeath Wrote: put all words in one dict and use combinator3 from hashcat-utils
thanks
This will result in a few times the size of the dictionary
It's not that I want to customize efficient attacks
RE: Why do not many combination rules have such a rule? - CUwindows00 - 04-06-2018
cat 1.txt
abc
cat 2.txt
123
cat 3.txt
!@#$
Generation of dictionary attacks
abc123!@#
abc!@#$123
123abc!@#$
123!@#$abc
!@#$123abc
!@#$abc123
If this rule is added, it does not produce more than one line
That will optimize dictionary volume and make attack more directive.
It saves a lot of time
RE: Why do not many combination rules have such a rule? - CUwindows00 - 04-09-2018
(04-06-2018, 09:30 AM)undeath Wrote: put all words in one dict and use combinator3 from hashcat-utilsHi...
if Put in a dictionary, the volume will be 10 times larger, which is not a good rule.
Good rules should be pertinent
For example, there are multiple combinations below. It is efficient to transform files to different locations attack
Code:
./combinator.bin file1 file2 file3Code:
combinator
file1 file2 file3
file1 file3 file2
file2 file3 file1
file2 file1 file3
file3 file1 file2
file3 file2 file1If can change their position to attack
I want to add an automatic transformation location rule
Are there any rules of this kind?
If not, how should I write it out?
RE: Advanced combination attack rule - CUwindows00 - 04-09-2018
Hi...