![]() |
Extensible Build Review - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Misc (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-15.html) +--- Forum: Hardware (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-13.html) +--- Thread: Extensible Build Review (/thread-7976.html) |
Extensible Build Review - NoReply - 11-27-2018 Hey guys, going to build a GPU Cluster for a small Forensics company. It should be extensible to 7 GPUs with the current specifcations, however the chassis is able to hold 8. Already did some research, here is what I have so far: Fixed (i. e. already purchased):
Unfixed:
Happy about any kind of feedback ![]() RE: Extensible Build Review - MrMeeseeks - 11-30-2018 RTX 2080 Ti is definitely not a good choice - the cards do not stack and they draw way too much power (enough to damage the motherboard.) And why do you want to use a 6U chassis with PCIe risers for only 4 GPUs? You may want to check out Sagitta HPC since you don't really seem to know what you are doing. RE: Extensible Build Review - NoReply - 12-01-2018 Thank you for the feedback. (11-30-2018, 10:38 PM)MrMeeseeks Wrote: RTX 2080 Ti is definitely not a good choice Agreed, but it is too late to RMA them. So we are looking for a way to make some use of them. (11-30-2018, 10:38 PM)MrMeeseeks Wrote: they draw way too much power (enough to damage the motherboard.) How does one determine the maximum amount of cards / power a motherboard can handle? Besides, we are moving away from the thought of further extending this build, i. e. we replace the board and the CPU with something that only handles 4 GPUs at max. (E. g. ASRock Fatal1ty X399 Professional Gaming + 1900X) (11-30-2018, 10:38 PM)MrMeeseeks Wrote: And why do you want to use a 6U chassis with PCIe risers for only 4 GPUs? Got plenty of space in our cabinets and found the 6U chassis to be fairly suitable. The chassis requires the use of risers. Really looking for a setting where those 4 cards work properly cooled in our cabinet. (11-30-2018, 10:38 PM)MrMeeseeks Wrote: You may want to check out Sagitta HPC since you don't really seem to know what you are doing. Already did, but it does not help in this case. The goal for now is to build something working around the RTX cards. Mistakes have been made purchasing them before anything else, now looking to find a solution. Best, NoReply RE: Extensible Build Review - undeath - 12-01-2018 (11-30-2018, 10:38 PM)MrMeeseeks Wrote: and they draw way too much power (enough to damage the motherboard.) Has Nvidia pulled an AMD on the new cards? It's the first time I hear Nvidia cards exhibiting that behaviour. RE: Extensible Build Review - slyexe - 12-02-2018 Quote:Has Nvidia pulled an AMD on the new cards? It's the first time I hear Nvidia cards exhibiting that behaviour. A peak of 4.3A on the motherboard slot's 12V rail is well within the PCI-SIG's 5.5A limit. Nvidia's balancing scheme works perfectly, leaving ample room for enthusiasts to overclock. Seems to me he's making up information. RE: Extensible Build Review - soxrok2212 - 12-02-2018 I haven’t tested myself, but I don’t think we’re nearly at the realm of AMD. My dual R9 390X each sucked up almost 400W. The 2080 Ti, while certainly a HORRIBLE card for the money, can’t even use any of the fancy ray tracing cores so I doubt power consumption would be so high that it can cause damage. Perhaps someone who dropped an arm and a leg to get one can post numbers. RE: Extensible Build Review - NoReply - 01-08-2019 Sorry for the late response, here is an update for the planning of the build. Concerning @soxrok2212 's question, according to hwinfo, one of our single 2080 Ti's peaked at 280W during a real hashcat job, not just the benchmark. For the build, we moved away from the thought of being extensible, here are the things that changed:
Best, NoReply |