![]() |
Hashcat 5.1 beta output format incorrectly displayed - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: hashcat (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-45.html) +--- Thread: Hashcat 5.1 beta output format incorrectly displayed (/thread-9051.html) |
Hashcat 5.1 beta output format incorrectly displayed - intem - 03-18-2020 The format is displayed incorrectly: 3 | hash [: salt]: plain Thanks. RE: Hashcat 5.1 beta output format incorrectly displayed - philsmd - 03-18-2020 the format changed with https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/pull/2292 (requested here: https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/issues/2255). The --help output should reflect the new format that should be used: Code: --outfile-format | Str | Outfile format to use, separated with commas RE: Hashcat 5.1 beta output format incorrectly displayed - intem - 03-19-2020 We have: 1 | hash [: salt] 2 | plain 3 | hex_plain 4 | crack_pos 5 | timestamp absolute 6 | timestamp relative We type: --outfile-format = 1,2 I get the desired result. Many thanks. RE: Hashcat 5.1 beta output format incorrectly displayed - philsmd - 03-19-2020 that's by the way the default format... you only need to use --outfile-format parameter if it is different from "1,2" RE: Hashcat 5.1 beta output format incorrectly displayed - intem - 03-19-2020 (03-19-2020, 01:39 PM)philsmd Wrote: that's by the way the default format... you only need to use --outfile-format parameter if it is different from "1,2" Default 1.3 RE: Hashcat 5.1 beta output format incorrectly displayed - philsmd - 03-19-2020 What is the hash type that you are using ? What's the hashcat version (try with https://hashcat.net/beta) ? The default with 1,2 is to use "$HEX[" and the hexadecimal chars and "]" at the end if the password contains the separator character (":") or non-printable bytes. With 1,3 you do not have the "$HEX[" , nor "]", within the output . They are very different. Please test again and explain exactly what you do/run and what you see. Thanks RE: Hashcat 5.1 beta output format incorrectly displayed - intem - 03-19-2020 (03-19-2020, 04:06 PM)philsmd Wrote: What is the hash type that you are using ? What's the hashcat version (try with https://hashcat.net/beta) ?I use to hack WPA. It is about this latest version that we are talking about. Here is the contents of the .exe file: [url= ![]() RE: Hashcat 5.1 beta output format incorrectly displayed - philsmd - 03-19-2020 Yeah, but that is not the default value, but just an example within the --help: Code: Options Short / Long | Type | Description | Example it clearly says, that it is an Example . The default value is still 1,2 RE: Hashcat 5.1 beta output format incorrectly displayed - intem - 03-19-2020 Yes!!! You're right. Thank you very much for your perseverance. |