stdout speed between hashcat-cli64.exe V2.0 and hashcat64 v5.1.0 - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: hashcat (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-45.html) +--- Thread: stdout speed between hashcat-cli64.exe V2.0 and hashcat64 v5.1.0 (/thread-9250.html) |
stdout speed between hashcat-cli64.exe V2.0 and hashcat64 v5.1.0 - WPA_Catcher - 05-24-2020 I have been learning how rules modify password candidates in hashcat and have found using --stdout to a text file very useful. I have noticed a significant difference in speed between hashcat-cli64.exe V2.0 and hashcat64 v5.1.0. but not in the way I expected. For speed testing purposes I used a 118MB rule file and a single password candidate to modify. A sample (not all) of the batch commands I used. hashcat-cli64.exe V2.0 hashcat-cli64.exe -r TestRules.rule TestPass.txt --stdout >> TestOutput.txt hashcat-cli64.exe -n 64 -r TestRules.rule TestPass.txt --stdout >> TestOutput.txt hashcat64 v5.1.0 hashcat64 -r TestRules.rule TestPass.txt --stdout >> TestOutput.txt hashcat64 -D 1 -r TestRules.rule TestPass.txt --stdout >> TestOutput.txt hashcat64 -w 3 -r TestRules.rule TestPass.txt --stdout >> TestOutput.txt I tried combinations of -w (hashcat64 v5.1.0.) and -n (hashcat-cli64.exe V2.0), or none at all, in my batch scripts with little to no effect. Every time both output files were almost identical except for 10 - 20 lines out of approx 18921740 lines so the output is not significantly different which would have otherwise explained it. The speed difference is huge: hashcat-cli64.exe V2.0 - generally takes approx 70 seconds hashcat64 v5.1.0 - generally takes approx 420 seconds My system: No GPU hashcat would be interested in so I use CPU option. Win7 64bit Sp1 and all updates. Could someone please let me know if I am using the wrong commands or if hashcat64 v5.1.0 is supposed to take longer for some technical reason, perhaps better validity checking etc? Thank you |