+- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-3.html)
+--- Forum: hashcat (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-45.html)
+--- Thread: Too fast cracking (/thread-9917.html)
Pages:
1
2
RE: Too fast cracking - buba22 - 03-13-2021
(03-13-2021, 03:09 PM)Snoopy Wrote: well i have to admit i didnt read very well your first post and your commandline but
7000 Kilohashes per second are 7.000.000 so 7 Millions hashes per second, with a plain wordlist of 15 million words withput any rules applied yeah 2 seconds + time needed for hashcat and you are done
I have gpu nvidia 950m, and I think this is not passible. Another hash takes alot longer
RE: Too fast cracking - Snoopy - 03-14-2021
whats do you mean? same hashtype and attackvector?
the numbers are taken from your postings so its quite simple math
RE: Too fast cracking - buba22 - 03-14-2021
(03-14-2021, 07:30 PM)Snoopy Wrote: whats do you mean? same hashtype and attackvector?
the numbers are taken from your postings so its quite simple math
another hashtype, for me looks unrealistic for this gpu
RE: Too fast cracking - Snoopy - 03-16-2021
you can compare/benchmark different hashtypes with -b and see for yourself
(plain md5)
hashcat -b -m 0
Speed.#*.........: 8398.9 MH/s
(bitlocker)
hashcat -b -m 22100
Speed.#*.........: 621 H/s
so 8400 Mio hashes per second vs 621 hashes per second it ALL depends on the hashtype you are attacking
RE: Too fast cracking - buba22 - 03-17-2021
Thank you
RE: Too fast cracking - undeath - 03-17-2021
(03-13-2021, 08:12 PM)buba22 Wrote: I have gpu nvidia 950m, and I think this is not passible. Another hash takes alot longer
For some context, using a similar pkzip hash to the one from your first post, my CPU (AMD Ryzen 1600) delivers about 68 MH/s, so 10x faster than your mobile GPU. Doesn't seem unrealistic to me at all.