|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[asc]
|
| |
|
Thread: wireshark cap clean up does not make sense
Post: RE: wireshark cap clean up does not make sense
| Thank you replying soxrock2212.
I thought I needed at least 1,2 and 4 for a handshake to be complete. Only needing 1 and 2 makes sense why this now works.
You say the devices are different in sm... |
|
BusiFix |
hashcat
|
5 |
13,373 |
02-22-2018, 01:51 PM |
| |
|
Thread: wireshark cap clean up does not make sense
Post: RE: wireshark cap clean up does not make sense
| Sorry, file did not attach. It is here http://dropcanvas.com/lfd6o |
|
BusiFix |
hashcat
|
5 |
13,373 |
02-20-2018, 06:38 PM |
| |
|
Thread: wireshark cap clean up does not make sense
Post: RE: wireshark cap clean up does not make sense
| Update: I have now got it down to
Beacon Frame
Message 1 of 4
Message 2 of 4
When converted to hccapx this will be cracked. Why does this work?
Thanks in advance
BusiFix |
|
BusiFix |
hashcat
|
5 |
13,373 |
02-20-2018, 01:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: wireshark cap clean up does not make sense
Post: wireshark cap clean up does not make sense
| Hi,
I have a router that has been decommissioned from a local company. The SSID is SMC-1 and the WPA password is motorhomes. I used hashcat and rockyou.txt to crack and all is good.
I then wante... |
|
BusiFix |
hashcat
|
5 |
13,373 |
02-20-2018, 01:24 PM |
