|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[asc]
|
| |
|
Thread: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./cudaHashcat64.bin)
Post: RE: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./...
| Meh, looks like this method does not work on oclHashcat as well as it did on hashcat. Seeing weirdness. Disregard. |
|
rajak |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
50,020 |
06-19-2014, 04:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./cudaHashcat64.bin)
Post: RE: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./...
| I'm running RHEL6 on one of my cracker boxes and have had similar issues. Actually first started happening with hashcat 64bit a while back where it wanted glibc 2.14. Now oclhashcat wants 2.15. I've b... |
|
rajak |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
50,020 |
06-19-2014, 04:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashes from freeradius-wpe
Post: RE: Hashes from freeradius-wpe
|
fuzztester Wrote: (08-28-2013, 03:59 PM)
--
bob:$NETNTLM$a415001cd5900a32$632e803415162e36652263799f8e8a1c05a6bc4d0ecf5d72
--
I was just looking at this myself this morning. The hash just needs some... |
|
rajak |
User Contributions
|
5 |
30,384 |
08-28-2013, 04:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Lotus HTTP Hash
Post: RE: Lotus HTTP Hash
|
atom Wrote: (05-06-2010, 09:09 AM)
--
never heared of this algo. are you sure that this important for a bigger number of users? i try to add it in a later version, but i will give it a lower priority... |
|
rajak |
Feature Requests
|
14 |
59,420 |
09-22-2012, 12:45 AM |
