Search Results
|
Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[asc]
|
|
|
Thread: Better leet.table file for Table-Lookup mode
Post: RE: Better leet.table file for Table-Lookup mode
hehe you must be using a beta version of yours again ;)
Here is what I get with a stock hashcat-0.37 (did not modified anything):
Code:
--
$ echo password > word
$ ./hashcat-cli64.bin --stdout... |
|
lanjelot |
Old hashcat Support
|
3 |
16,116 |
10-29-2011, 12:32 PM |
|
|
Thread: Better leet.table file for Table-Lookup mode
Post: Better leet.table file for Table-Lookup mode
The table-lookup mode is great to produce all the leet possibilites of one word, but the leet.table file from hashcat-0.37 is not right.
If you enable debug mode, you will see that the word "passwo... |
|
lanjelot |
Old hashcat Support
|
3 |
16,116 |
10-28-2011, 04:00 PM |
|
|
Thread: [split] [split] oclHashcat v0.26 - not cracking ntlm hashes
Post: RE: [split] [split] oclHashcat v0.26 - not crackin...
I have the exact same issue.
Env:
Linux 2.6.32-26-server #48-Ubuntu SMP Wed Nov 24 10:28:32 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux
nVidia GTX 460 with nvidia-current 280.13-0ubuntu1~lucid~xup1 |
|
lanjelot |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
45,701 |
10-14-2011, 05:13 PM |
|
|
Thread: A more effective leetspeak rule file for oclHashcat-plus
Post: RE: A more effective leetspeak rule file for oclHa...
Sure, i'm ok with it ;)
cheers!
|
|
lanjelot |
User Contributions
|
3 |
22,744 |
09-12-2011, 10:06 AM |
|
|
Thread: A more effective leetspeak rule file for oclHashcat-plus
Post: A more effective leetspeak rule file for oclHashca...
A more complete set of leet rules that some people may find useful.
Please read instructions into the source code of attached file.[hr]
If you are using hashcat (eg. hashcat-0.37), you should use t... |
|
lanjelot |
User Contributions
|
3 |
22,744 |
09-11-2011, 04:11 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus silently truncates password candidates to 15 characters
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus silently truncates password ca...
What version were you using? Me, I don't have the "Password lengths range: 1 - 15" message you have! :) Maybe it's because you are on Windows wheras I am on Linux.
Anyway, using oclHashcat-plus-0.05,... |
|
lanjelot |
Feature Requests
|
4 |
20,289 |
09-11-2011, 03:40 PM |
|
|
Thread: [hashcat-0.37] bug in substitute rule
Post: [hashcat-0.37] bug in substitute rule
When a substitute rule (eg. sa@) would not change anything to a word candidate (eg. "secret" does not have any 'a'), hashcat outputs a weird/unpredictible word, although it should skip the word instea... |
|
lanjelot |
Old hashcat Support
|
1 |
10,105 |
09-11-2011, 12:03 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus silently truncates password candidates to 15 characters
Post: oclHashcat-plus silently truncates password candid...
While conducting a pentest, I needed to crack a super-admin hash, so I ran oclHashcat-plus on a small wordlist with very efficient rules, no luck.
Just to be sure, I gave john the ripper a shot as ... |
|
lanjelot |
Feature Requests
|
4 |
20,289 |
08-27-2011, 09:09 PM |
|
|
Thread: SHA512(Unix) broken in hashcat-cli32
Post: SHA512(Unix) broken in hashcat-cli32
## Description
On linux 32bit, hashcat -m 1800 does not recover any hashes although i provide the actual passwords.
## Environment
$ uname -a
Linux 2.6.36-gentoo-r5 #11 SMP Sat Feb 5 22:00:24 CE... |
|
lanjelot |
Old hashcat Support
|
0 |
7,412 |
02-20-2011, 03:52 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat better salted hash support
Post: oclHashcat better salted hash support
Because oclHashcat currently does not support SSHA hashes, I thought the workaround would be to use -m 101 = sha1($pass.$salt)
But this does not work well, as the salt can actually contain charact... |
|
lanjelot |
Feature Requests
|
1 |
10,433 |
02-07-2011, 06:27 PM |
|
|
Thread: Recovered hashes percentage
Post: Recovered hashes percentage
Hey atom,
Having a percentage of cracked hashes in the Recovered: line would be nice i guess.
Like:
Recovered.: 46271/943673 hashes (20.39%), 0/1 salts
Thanks heaps :) |
|
lanjelot |
Feature Requests
|
0 |
7,142 |
02-07-2011, 02:51 PM |