|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[asc]
|
| |
|
Thread: Hashes that don't work well with --remove
Post: RE: Hashes that don't work well with --remove
|
Chick3nman Wrote: (11-05-2024, 01:55 AM)
--
Ahhh, this is for the special file format handling for NT:LM and shadow files. If you want to avoid that issue, you need to load the hashes in their raw fo... |
|
ZerkerEOD |
hashcat
|
5 |
9,486 |
11-06-2024, 12:46 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashes that don't work well with --remove
Post: RE: Hashes that don't work well with --remove
| Chick3nman, I get the "Use of --remove is not supported in native hashfile-format mode." error. The hash is a straight pull from NTDS which looks like 'Administrator:500:LM:NT::: (status=Enabled)'. Wi... |
|
ZerkerEOD |
hashcat
|
5 |
9,486 |
11-04-2024, 01:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hashes that don't work well with --remove
Post: Hashes that don't work well with --remove
| I was hoping to get a list of hashes that do not work well with --remove. Right now, I know if I try to feed hashcat a hashlist using --remove with hashes straight from something like an NTDS file, it... |
|
ZerkerEOD |
hashcat
|
5 |
9,486 |
11-02-2024, 10:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: How are duplicate, but different, hashes for small subset of unique users handled
Post: RE: How are duplicate, but different, hashes for s...
| @PenguinKeeper,
Thank you so much for helping me understand. I wasn't thinking of the salts, which was a boneheaded mistake on my side, knowing they were salted. |
|
ZerkerEOD |
hashcat
|
2 |
5,744 |
05-20-2024, 12:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: How are duplicate, but different, hashes for small subset of unique users handled
Post: How are duplicate, but different, hashes for small...
| So I am trying to figure out how hashcat handles duplicates of hashes such as NTLMv2 (5600) when you have say 2500+ hashes for only 12 unique users. My thought was always that the GPU's handled the al... |
|
ZerkerEOD |
hashcat
|
2 |
5,744 |
05-17-2024, 12:34 PM |
