|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[asc]
|
| |
|
Thread: Some feature
Post: RE: Some feature
| @Atom:
Thanks for your answers. By dummy mode I meant just what mastercracker says: test rules and dictionaries against a list of passwords without hashing. |
|
twitty |
Feature Requests
|
6 |
22,733 |
08-18-2012, 07:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Some feature
Post: Some feature
| First I want to thank Atom for this wonderful software. :) I find it to be the best cracker and it helped me more than other tools.
I would like to see implemented if possible in some future versions... |
|
twitty |
Feature Requests
|
6 |
22,733 |
08-16-2012, 08:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [HowTo] Depot oclHashcat-plus's hashcat.pot perfectly
Post: RE: [HowTo] Depot oclHashcat-plus's hashcat.pot pe...
| If the hash is 40 in length, for example:
cat hashcat.pot | cut -c42-99 > passwords.txt
So it cuts columns 42 - 99. |
|
twitty |
General Talk
|
6 |
28,702 |
08-16-2012, 07:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: dictionary for wordpress hash
Post: RE: dictionary for wordpress hash
| If the algorithm is costly you might want to use small dictionaries when using rules. I don't imagine myself trying to crack sha512 using 1 gig dictionary with big rules. |
|
twitty |
General Talk
|
5 |
23,711 |
08-16-2012, 07:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Efficient way to store hashes in database ?
Post: RE: Efficient way to store hashes in database ?
| As Bitweasil said, MySQL is too slow. Try key/value as he suggested. I myself would use at MongoDB because it already is very efficient and it also has very nice support and there are many examples/li... |
|
twitty |
General Talk
|
5 |
24,659 |
08-16-2012, 07:24 PM |
