|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[asc]
|
| |
|
Thread: LUKS v2 Support
Post: RE: LUKS v2 Support
|
atom Wrote: (08-07-2025, 03:51 PM)
--
It's usually 4096 anti-forensics blocks, people often confused that with bytes. So basically what you need is a size that allows reading the first encrypted sect... |
|
rigatoni101 |
hashcat
|
8 |
8,274 |
08-07-2025, 04:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: LUKS v2 Support
Post: RE: LUKS v2 Support
|
atom Wrote: (08-07-2025, 03:40 PM)
--
Ah ok that is probably the problem, why 4096?
--
I'm working off a E01 and not a physical drive, I did mount it in Linux but the script wouldn't except the con... |
|
rigatoni101 |
hashcat
|
8 |
8,274 |
08-07-2025, 03:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: LUKS v2 Support
Post: RE: LUKS v2 Support
|
atom Wrote: (08-07-2025, 03:31 PM)
--
How you did you the extraction script exactly? Looks like the data portion has been truncated
--
I have purposely only included the first bit as the full hash ... |
|
rigatoni101 |
hashcat
|
8 |
8,274 |
08-07-2025, 03:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: LUKS v2 Support
Post: RE: LUKS v2 Support
|
atom Wrote: (08-07-2025, 03:09 PM)
--
If it's argon2i, that support was added in recent beta, use hashcat.net/beta
--
Hello, thanks for your reply. I have just used the beta and received the same... |
|
rigatoni101 |
hashcat
|
8 |
8,274 |
08-07-2025, 03:23 PM |
| |
|
Thread: LUKS v2 Support
Post: LUKS v2 Support
| Hello,
I am currently attempting to try out the new LUKS v2 support with Hashcat 7.0.0. However, I'm facing some issues.
I have used DD to capture the LUKS header and supplied that to the luks2h... |
|
rigatoni101 |
hashcat
|
8 |
8,274 |
08-07-2025, 02:59 PM |
