LM hash support for OCLHC
#29
(02-07-2012, 10:02 AM)chort Wrote: This is because it cracks each half of the hash independently, and because each half is at most 7 characters and you specified a minimum of 8, there are no possible valid combinations.

I was wondering how this new feature would be implemented. It'd be nice to see it able to take half of the LM hash at a time and be able process it separately.

(02-07-2012, 10:02 AM)chort Wrote: On the other hand, it only takes about 200 minutes to brute-force the entire 7-character ?u?d?s space for LM, which will give you both sides (I did it this afternoon on a 14-character LM password).

What card are you using that it will only take 200 minutes?
I'm running a 5670 and it says 23 hours, and the speed is 88400k/s.
NTLM runs at 2200M/s. Is this normal?


Messages In This Thread
LM hash support for OCLHC - by Rolf - 10-21-2010, 12:47 PM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by D3ad0ne - 10-22-2010, 03:29 AM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by mastercracker - 10-22-2010, 03:06 PM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by Dr-Tibetor - 10-28-2010, 09:51 AM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by alto - 11-10-2010, 08:20 PM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by blandyuk - 11-19-2010, 01:59 AM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by mastercracker - 11-19-2010, 07:58 PM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by blandyuk - 04-07-2011, 11:07 AM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by Mem5 - 08-28-2011, 12:21 PM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by Bitweasil - 09-13-2011, 03:55 PM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by panda - 11-18-2011, 12:47 PM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by Mem5 - 01-01-2012, 02:32 PM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by atom - 02-01-2012, 11:27 PM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by mastercracker - 02-04-2012, 09:18 PM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by mabu - 02-02-2012, 02:43 PM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by Mem5 - 02-02-2012, 11:56 PM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by atom - 02-04-2012, 09:19 PM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by chort - 02-05-2012, 01:09 AM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by fatalx - 02-05-2012, 06:23 AM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by chort - 02-05-2012, 06:38 AM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by fatalx - 02-05-2012, 05:05 PM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by K9 - 02-05-2012, 05:15 PM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by fatalx - 02-06-2012, 02:21 AM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by Mem5 - 02-05-2012, 09:11 PM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by atom - 02-06-2012, 10:53 AM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by chort - 02-06-2012, 05:39 AM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by fatalx - 02-07-2012, 01:52 AM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by chort - 02-07-2012, 10:02 AM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by fatalx - 02-08-2012, 02:11 AM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by atom - 02-08-2012, 11:08 AM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by chort - 02-08-2012, 02:18 AM
RE: LM hash support for OCLHC - by atom - 05-08-2012, 04:02 PM