3Des - ECB brute forcing
#10
(11-15-2013, 04:19 PM)atom Wrote: which key? the key is unknown.

Wouldn't it be bruteforceable if they used the same key for triple des.

Keying option 1: All three keys are independent.
Keying option 2: K1 and K2 are independent, and K3 = K1.
Keying option 3: All three keys are identical, i.e. K1 = K2 = K3.


Keying option 1 is the strongest, with 3 × 56 = 168 independent key bits.

Keying option 2 provides less security, with 2 × 56 = 112 key bits. This option is stronger than simply DES encrypting twice, e.g. with K1 and K2, because it protects against meet-in-the-middle attacks.

Keying option 3 is equivalent to DES, with only 56 key bits. This option provides backward compatibility with DES, because the first and second DES operations cancel out. It is no longer recommended by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST),[4] and is not supported by ISO/IEC 18033-3.


Messages In This Thread
3Des - ECB brute forcing - by clearmoon - 11-11-2013, 04:39 PM
RE: 3Des - ECB brute forcing - by atom - 11-11-2013, 04:45 PM
RE: 3Des - ECB brute forcing - by Sc00bz - 11-12-2013, 02:10 AM
RE: 3Des - ECB brute forcing - by zeroprobe - 11-13-2013, 09:59 AM
RE: 3Des - ECB brute forcing - by vima - 11-15-2013, 01:00 AM
RE: 3Des - ECB brute forcing - by epixoip - 11-15-2013, 03:04 AM
RE: 3Des - ECB brute forcing - by vima - 11-15-2013, 03:24 AM
RE: 3Des - ECB brute forcing - by zeroprobe - 11-15-2013, 12:10 PM
RE: 3Des - ECB brute forcing - by atom - 11-15-2013, 04:19 PM
RE: 3Des - ECB brute forcing - by zeroprobe - 11-16-2013, 02:50 AM
RE: 3Des - ECB brute forcing - by vima - 11-18-2013, 01:25 AM