oclhc+ bug?
#1
Somehow I have hit a wall with oclhc+ which looks like a bug. As I did not find any pw so far, I set up a test scenario and I did the same hashfile and wordlist with both hc 0.36 and oclhc+ 0.03. While hc (correctly) finds 13 passes, oclhc+ only finds 2.

For testing purposes, I am not using a ruleset with either of the programs.

Please see full cmdline and output below.

Am I doing something wrong?

Thanks
J+

#############HC OUTPUT:

# hashcat-0.36/hashcat-cli64.bin -m 1100 -o ../data/fnd ../data/HASHES.ALL.hc8 ../data/passdic
Initializing with 8 threads and 32mb segment-size...

NOTE: press enter for status-screen

Added hashes from file ../data/HASHES.ALL.hc8: 46 (44 salts)
Wordlist..: ../data/passdic
Index.....: 1/1 (segment), 19 (words), 140 (bytes)
Recovered.: 13/46 hashes, 13/44 salts
Speed/sec.: - plains, - words
Progress..: 19/19 (100.00%)

#############OCLHC+ OUTPUT:

# oclHashcat+-0.03/oclHashcat+64.bin -m 1100 -o ../data/fnd ../data/HASHES.ALL.hc8 ../data/passdic
oclHashcat+ v0.03 starting...

Hashes: 46
Bitmaps: 9 bits, 512 entries, 0x000001ff mask, 2048 bytes
Rules: 1
Platform: ATI compatible platform found
Device #1: Cayman, 1024MB, 0Mhz, 22MCU
Device #2: Cayman, 1024MB, 0Mhz, 22MCU
NOTE: gpu-accel auto-adjusted to: 8
Device #1: Kernel oclHashcat+-0.03/kernels/4098/m1100.Cayman.64.kernel (1136096 bytes)
Device #2: Kernel oclHashcat+-0.03/kernels/4098/m1100.Cayman.64.kernel (1136096 bytes)

Starting attack in wordlist_mode...

p: 0/46, cs: 16, cr: 0, cl: 4, rt: 7.33ms, s: 4.37k/s
p: 0/46, cs: 32, cr: 0, cl: 4, rt: 4.16ms, s: 7.69k/s
p: 1/46, cs: 2, cr: 0, cl: 5, rt: 5.47ms, s: 5.48k/s
p: 1/46, cs: 18, cr: 0, cl: 5, rt: 3.12ms, s: 5.14k/s
p: 1/46, cs: 34, cr: 0, cl: 5, rt: 3.15ms, s: 5.08k/s
p: 1/46, cs: 5, cr: 0, cl: 6, rt: 4.29ms, s: 16.56k/s
p: 1/46, cs: 21, cr: 0, cl: 6, rt: 3.23ms, s: 59.39k/s
p: 2/46, cs: 37, cr: 0, cl: 6, rt: 3.47ms, s: 55.32k/s
p: 2/46, cs: 8, cr: 0, cl: 7, rt: 3.85ms, s: 27.03k/s
p: 2/46, cs: 25, cr: 0, cl: 7, rt: 2.66ms, s: 6.03k/s
p: 2/46, cs: 41, cr: 0, cl: 7, rt: 2.73ms, s: 5.87k/s
p: 2/46, cs: 12, cr: 0, cl: 8, rt: 3.92ms, s: 7.14k/s
p: 2/46, cs: 29, cr: 0, cl: 8, rt: 2.74ms, s: 11.66k/s
p: 2/46, cs: 46, cr: 0, cl: 8, rt: 2.72ms, s: 11.74k/s
p: 2/46, cs: 16, cr: 0, cl: 13, rt: 3.90ms, s: 4.11k/s
p: 2/46, cs: 33, cr: 0, cl: 13, rt: 2.73ms, s: 5.85k/s

Processed 19 words in 111.91ms = 0.17k/s


Messages In This Thread
oclhc+ bug? - by acubens - 02-23-2011, 08:52 PM
RE: oclhc+ bug? - by atom - 02-23-2011, 09:34 PM
RE: oclhc+ bug? - by acubens - 02-24-2011, 05:08 PM
RE: oclhc+ bug? - by acubens - 02-25-2011, 10:15 AM
RE: oclhc+ bug? - by atom - 02-25-2011, 12:42 PM
RE: oclhc+ bug? - by acubens - 02-25-2011, 01:15 PM
RE: oclhc+ bug? - by mastercracker - 02-26-2011, 05:51 AM
RE: oclhc+ bug? - by acubens - 02-28-2011, 06:51 PM