09-17-2011, 11:21 PM
Rolf, thanks for the tip to use maskprocessor.
Forumhero, thank you very much for the code you took the time to write out, I am going to study it !
Atom…
I totally understand and please don’t for a minute think I was ungrateful, text based communication is not the best way to convey mood so please don’t take it the wrong way. I have helped out on a few projects over the last few years and I know how miserable and lonely it can feel when all you seem to get back is bug reports and complaints !
I am also acutely Aspergic so please bear with me ! No seriously, I am !! ha ha !
I meant dictionaries, I feel sad about the wasted bandwidth and disk space used up when most of these so called “Uber L33t†dictionaries contain littler more than a few base words and then a suffix a number. I actually once downloaded a word list from a well known h4cK3r site which claimed to have 1,000,000 unique passwords in it. Well to be fair they weren’t lying but ….password1 – password1000000 is a bit of a disappointment to say the least. I kid you not !
My goal is to have dictionaries containing lower case base words only, thus massively reducing their size and then use the new functions (hopefully) in hashcat+ to modify them on the fly. So in the example above that 1,000,000 word list could actually be a single line, password.
There is much more to this as I know we can add numbers to the end with hashcat+ now but words such as PaSswOrD123! are a little harder to mutate at the moment.
It is a late here just now and my girlfriend (she who must be obeyed) has just presented me with a list of jobs to do and I am more frightened of her than I am keen to see these new implementations in hashcat+. I just wanted to quickly reply to you with something at least. Now I know you are a conscientious sort of chap and seem to be tolerating me at the moment I will think about hashcat+ a little more and try to present my requests and ideas in a more constructive and clearer way. I think it best if I get everything down in one go as some options may affect others later down the line.
Thank you atom and please don’t ever think anyone is ungrateful for your work, as I said before, you make computers fun !
Forumhero, thank you very much for the code you took the time to write out, I am going to study it !
Atom…
Quote:This is a non-profit project. Please appreciate this circumstance.
I totally understand and please don’t for a minute think I was ungrateful, text based communication is not the best way to convey mood so please don’t take it the wrong way. I have helped out on a few projects over the last few years and I know how miserable and lonely it can feel when all you seem to get back is bug reports and complaints !
I am also acutely Aspergic so please bear with me ! No seriously, I am !! ha ha !
Quote:Massive lists !!
I meant dictionaries, I feel sad about the wasted bandwidth and disk space used up when most of these so called “Uber L33t†dictionaries contain littler more than a few base words and then a suffix a number. I actually once downloaded a word list from a well known h4cK3r site which claimed to have 1,000,000 unique passwords in it. Well to be fair they weren’t lying but ….password1 – password1000000 is a bit of a disappointment to say the least. I kid you not !
My goal is to have dictionaries containing lower case base words only, thus massively reducing their size and then use the new functions (hopefully) in hashcat+ to modify them on the fly. So in the example above that 1,000,000 word list could actually be a single line, password.
There is much more to this as I know we can add numbers to the end with hashcat+ now but words such as PaSswOrD123! are a little harder to mutate at the moment.
It is a late here just now and my girlfriend (she who must be obeyed) has just presented me with a list of jobs to do and I am more frightened of her than I am keen to see these new implementations in hashcat+. I just wanted to quickly reply to you with something at least. Now I know you are a conscientious sort of chap and seem to be tolerating me at the moment I will think about hashcat+ a little more and try to present my requests and ideas in a more constructive and clearer way. I think it best if I get everything down in one go as some options may affect others later down the line.
Thank you atom and please don’t ever think anyone is ungrateful for your work, as I said before, you make computers fun !