Vbulletin Low Bruteforce Speed?
#3
Yes, it's evident from the stats that oclhashcat-plus is more optimized than oclhashcat. So, to reiterate my question:

What's the reason behind the better performance of oclhashcat-plus over oclhashcat? Just a few technical details (if possible?)
Is it possible to have the same optimization in oclhashcat for a mask attack too?


Messages In This Thread
Vbulletin Low Bruteforce Speed? - by NeonFlash - 11-07-2011, 12:43 PM
RE: Vbulletin Low Bruteforce Speed? - by Rolf - 11-07-2011, 01:34 PM
RE: Vbulletin Low Bruteforce Speed? - by NeonFlash - 11-07-2011, 03:28 PM
RE: Vbulletin Low Bruteforce Speed? - by Rolf - 11-07-2011, 08:04 PM