03-24-2012, 06:05 PM
Oxaners summed it up pretty good why I chose to do it like that.
It seems progress has slowed so I will help out a little bit.
Putting a list together manually wont cut it any more. You will need to do some coding.
You should use rules that perform different operations. I.e. the rules '6 and ]] are good in their own right but after you run one of them the other becomes less effective. So the idea would be to find which one is best and scrap the other one for a better rule that the previous rules have not covered.
The old best64.rule is a reasonably good rule file and quite a few of its rules will be in all the top submissions also, so it is a good starting point.
That is all I can think of for now, good luck!
It seems progress has slowed so I will help out a little bit.
Putting a list together manually wont cut it any more. You will need to do some coding.
You should use rules that perform different operations. I.e. the rules '6 and ]] are good in their own right but after you run one of them the other becomes less effective. So the idea would be to find which one is best and scrap the other one for a better rule that the previous rules have not covered.
The old best64.rule is a reasonably good rule file and quite a few of its rules will be in all the top submissions also, so it is a good starting point.
That is all I can think of for now, good luck!