why Hashcat v6.2.5 is slower than v5.1.0
#4
As for the --force option, you are absolutely right. However, in my case it works and gives the expected result.


Code:
C:\hashcat-5.1.0>hashcat64.exe  -D 2  --force  -a 3  -m 16800  "ca5396d611cf330aebefd48ebbfb0e63*020000000001*020000000020*61703031"  "12345678"

hashcat (v5.1.0) starting...

OpenCL Platform #1: Intel(R) Corporation
========================================
* Device #1: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 1005M @ 1.90GHz, skipped.
* Device #2: Intel(R) HD Graphics, 324/1297 MB allocatable, 6MCU

Hashes: 1 digests; 1 unique digests, 1 unique salts
Bitmaps: 16 bits, 65536 entries, 0x0000ffff mask, 262144 bytes, 5/13 rotates

Applicable optimizers:
* Zero-Byte
* Single-Hash
* Single-Salt
* Brute-Force
* Slow-Hash-SIMD-LOOP

Minimum password length supported by kernel: 8
Maximum password length supported by kernel: 63

Watchdog: Hardware monitoring interface not found on your system.
Watchdog: Temperature abort trigger disabled.

The wordlist or mask that you are using is too small.
This means that hashcat cannot use the full parallel power of your device(s).
Unless you supply more work, your cracking speed will drop.
For tips on supplying more work, see: https://hashcat.net/faq/morework

Approaching final keyspace - workload adjusted.

ca5396d611cf330aebefd48ebbfb0e63*020000000001*020000000020*61703031:12345678

Session..........: hashcat
Status...........: Cracked
Hash.Type........: WPA-PMKID-PBKDF2
Hash.Target......: ca5396d611cf330aebefd48ebbfb0e63*020000000001*02000...703031
Time.Started.....: Tue Feb 22 21:43:58 2022 (0 secs)
Time.Estimated...: Tue Feb 22 21:43:58 2022 (0 secs)
Guess.Mask.......: 12345678 [8]
Guess.Queue......: 1/1 (100.00%)
Speed.#2.........:        1 H/s (0.11ms) @ Accel:16 Loops:2 Thr:256 Vec:1
Recovered........: 1/1 (100.00%) Digests, 1/1 (100.00%) Salts
Progress.........: 1/1 (100.00%)
Rejected.........: 0/1 (0.00%)
Restore.Point....: 0/1 (0.00%)
Restore.Sub.#2...: Salt:0 Amplifier:0-1 Iteration:0-1
Candidates.#2....: 12345678 -> 12345678

Started: Tue Feb 22 21:43:54 2022
Stopped: Tue Feb 22 21:44:00 2022
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: why Hashcat v6.2.5 is slower than v5.1.0 - by v71221 - 02-22-2022, 08:57 PM