v62 is up
#47
(09-03-2012, 03:48 PM)M@LIK Wrote: Windows7 64-bit, nVidia, 304,79 beta, oclHashcat-plus-0.09b70.

Starting with previous bugs:
-m3100: Fixed! Great job as always!

-m3000:
.... -a0: This is weird, when I tried to stdin a single plain it cracked the pass, stding the whole dict did NOT work.
Please try with a dict at the end of your command OR with a "< dict".
Here's an example:
Code:
44EFCE164AB921CA:123456
echo 123456 > dict

hc64p -m3000 44EFCE164AB921CA dict
NOT FOUND!

hc64p -m3000 44EFCE164AB921CA < dict
NOT FOUND!

echo -n 123456 | hc64p -m3000 44EFCE164AB921CA
FOUND!

.... -a6: My theory says: Whenever the FULL 7 character long plain is present in your -a6 dictionary, hashcat wouldn't mind adding ANY char at the end of the cracked plain. E.g.:
Code:
E3493F9DD1EB6F82:______7

echo ______7 > dict    // notice the full plain

hc64p -m3000 -a6 E3493F9DD1EB6F82 dict 0
e3493f9dd1eb6f82:______70
Status.......: Cracked

hc64p -m3000 -a6 E3493F9DD1EB6F82 dict X
e3493f9dd1eb6f82:______7X
Status.......: Cracked

hc64p -m3000 -a6 E3493F9DD1EB6F82 dict ~
e3493f9dd1eb6f82:______7~
Status.......: Cracked

Testing this in deep raised another bug, I believe it's closely related to the one mentioned above:
Code:
E3493F9DD1EB6F82:______7

echo ______ > dict    // missing the last char only

hc64p -m3000 -a6 E3493F9DD1EB6F82 dict ?d
Status.......: Exhausted
Input.Base...: File (dict)
Input.Mod....: Mask (?d)

Exhausted!

Going to post about speed in a short time.

atom Wrote: how many hashes did you use for testing?
1mfakemd5.hash = 1 million.

atom Wrote: I am back at 304.x and CUDA 5.0 RC but still it has not the speed of 0.081 on high number of hashes. On low number of hashes, new version is faster. Can you verify?
I can verify, see below:

10 MD5 and 10 vBulletin 4:

oclHashcat-plus-0.08
hc64p -n320 --gpu-loops=512 -a3 -1 ?l?u?d?s --runtime=60 10md5.hash ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1
Speed........: 227.6M c/s Real, 227.7M c/s GPU
hc64p -n320 -m2711 -a3 -1 ?l?u?d?s --runtime=60 10vbu4.hash ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1
Speed........: 53132.3k c/s Real, 53142.0k c/s GPU


oclHashcat-plus-0.09b71
hc64p -n320 --gpu-loops=512 -a3 --bf-min=8 --runtime=60 10md5.hash ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a
Speed........: 263.5M c/s Real, 264.0M c/s GPU
hc64p -n320 -m2711 -a3 --bf-min=8 --runtime=60 10vbu4.hash ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a
Speed........: 63604.3k c/s Real, 63728.1k c/s GPU

Already tried 5k IPB hashes, the results were in favor of the new version.

This all can be explained by windows, which adds a space to each word. Thats why it can not you password.

Moral of this: DO NOT USE ECHO ON WINDOWS

Try again with real text editor pls


Messages In This Thread
v62 is up - by atom - 09-01-2012, 03:28 PM
RE: v62 is up - by mastercracker - 09-01-2012, 04:38 PM
RE: v62 is up + EDiT - by M@LIK - 09-01-2012, 04:48 PM
RE: v62 is up - by atom - 09-01-2012, 04:58 PM
RE: v62 is up - by atom - 09-01-2012, 08:05 PM
RE: v62 is up - by M@LIK - 09-01-2012, 08:26 PM
RE: v62 is up - by atom - 09-01-2012, 08:26 PM
RE: v62 is up - by atom - 09-01-2012, 08:28 PM
RE: v62 is up - by M@LIK - 09-01-2012, 08:31 PM
RE: v62 is up - by atom - 09-01-2012, 08:36 PM
RE: v62 is up - by atom - 09-01-2012, 08:47 PM
RE: v62 is up - by M@LIK - 09-01-2012, 08:51 PM
RE: v62 is up - by atom - 09-01-2012, 09:28 PM
RE: v62 is up - by blandyuk - 09-01-2012, 09:59 PM
RE: v62 is up - by atom - 09-01-2012, 11:29 PM
RE: v62 is up - by M@LIK - 09-01-2012, 10:55 PM
RE: v62 is up - by atom - 09-01-2012, 11:38 PM
RE: v62 is up - by M@LIK - 09-01-2012, 11:52 PM
RE: v62 is up - by atom - 09-02-2012, 12:09 AM
RE: v62 is up - by blandyuk - 09-02-2012, 12:55 AM
RE: v62 is up - by blandyuk - 09-02-2012, 10:42 AM
RE: v62 is up - by atom - 09-02-2012, 01:59 PM
RE: v62 is up - by atom - 09-02-2012, 01:46 PM
RE: v62 is up - by mastercracker - 09-02-2012, 02:20 PM
RE: v62 is up - by atom - 09-02-2012, 04:12 PM
RE: v62 is up - by mastercracker - 09-02-2012, 07:40 PM
RE: v62 is up - by atom - 09-02-2012, 07:54 PM
RE: v62 is up - by blandyuk - 09-02-2012, 07:06 PM
RE: v62 is up - by atom - 09-02-2012, 07:54 PM
RE: v62 is up + EDiT - by M@LIK - 09-02-2012, 09:54 PM
RE: v62 is up + EDiT - by m4tr1x - 09-03-2012, 12:11 AM
RE: v62 is up + EDiT - by atom - 09-03-2012, 10:25 AM
RE: v62 is up - by proinside - 09-03-2012, 01:41 AM
RE: v62 is up - by atom - 09-03-2012, 10:14 AM
RE: v62 is up - by mastercracker - 09-03-2012, 06:42 AM
RE: v62 is up - by blandyuk - 09-03-2012, 10:12 AM
RE: v62 is up - by atom - 09-03-2012, 10:23 AM
RE: v62 is up - by atom - 09-03-2012, 10:52 AM
RE: v62 is up - by atom - 09-03-2012, 11:26 AM
RE: v62 is up - by atom - 09-03-2012, 01:37 PM
RE: v62 is up - by mastercracker - 09-03-2012, 03:44 PM
RE: v62 is up (Y U JOIN MY POSTS?!) - by M@LIK - 09-03-2012, 03:48 PM
RE: v62 is up (Y U JOIN MY POSTS?!) - by atom - 09-03-2012, 08:16 PM
RE: v62 is up - by atom - 09-03-2012, 05:57 PM
RE: v62 is up - by atom - 09-03-2012, 06:28 PM
RE: v62 is up - by blandyuk - 09-03-2012, 06:28 PM
RE: v62 is up - by atom - 09-03-2012, 08:05 PM
RE: v62 is up + EDiT - by M@LIK - 09-03-2012, 08:18 PM
RE: v62 is up - by ati6990 - 09-03-2012, 08:36 PM
RE: v62 is up - by atom - 09-04-2012, 10:32 AM
RE: v62 is up - by Rolf - 09-04-2012, 11:22 AM
RE: v62 is up - by atom - 09-04-2012, 11:31 AM
RE: v62 is up - by blandyuk - 09-04-2012, 11:23 AM
RE: v62 is up - by atom - 09-04-2012, 11:59 AM
RE: v62 is up - by mastercracker - 09-04-2012, 01:47 PM
RE: v62 is up - by Rolf - 09-04-2012, 01:39 PM
RE: v62 is up - by atom - 09-04-2012, 02:02 PM
RE: v62 is up - by Rolf - 09-04-2012, 02:27 PM
RE: v62 is up - by M@LIK - 09-04-2012, 03:43 PM