|
Performance
|
01-27-2013, 10:44 AM
(01-27-2013, 09:45 AM)atom Wrote: Also note that -m 2611 is an iterated algorithm, not raw md5. Speed is at least twice as slow, maybe more. Indeed, but I expected it to be much faster. Using Hashcat CPU on my own PC (a high-end laptop) I'm getting around 25M/s so I thought that on a VPS running that incredible processor would be much faster instead of just being twice as fast. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Performance - by Abnormality - 01-26-2013, 06:15 AM
RE: Performance - by KT819GM - 01-26-2013, 06:46 AM
RE: Performance - by Abnormality - 01-26-2013, 06:56 AM
RE: Performance - by Kuci - 01-26-2013, 11:00 AM
RE: Performance - by Abnormality - 01-26-2013, 11:11 AM
RE: Performance - by Kuci - 01-26-2013, 11:24 AM
RE: Performance - by Abnormality - 01-26-2013, 12:46 PM
RE: Performance - by radix - 01-26-2013, 01:35 PM
RE: Performance - by Abnormality - 01-26-2013, 01:55 PM
RE: Performance - by Kuci - 01-26-2013, 05:27 PM
RE: Performance - by Abnormality - 01-26-2013, 11:15 PM
RE: Performance - by Kuci - 01-26-2013, 11:52 PM
RE: Performance - by Abnormality - 01-27-2013, 02:42 AM
RE: Performance - by atom - 01-27-2013, 09:45 AM
RE: Performance - by Abnormality - 01-27-2013, 10:44 AM
RE: Performance - by Kuci - 01-27-2013, 10:51 AM
RE: Performance - by Abnormality - 01-31-2013, 12:59 PM
RE: Performance - by undeath - 01-31-2013, 03:01 PM
RE: Performance - by epixoip - 01-31-2013, 04:29 PM
RE: Performance - by epixoip - 01-31-2013, 04:39 PM
RE: Performance - by Abnormality - 01-31-2013, 04:49 PM
RE: Performance - by epixoip - 01-31-2013, 06:45 PM
RE: Performance - by Abnormality - 01-31-2013, 09:04 PM
RE: Performance - by epixoip - 02-01-2013, 12:16 AM
RE: Performance - by Abnormality - 02-01-2013, 04:48 AM
RE: Performance - by epixoip - 02-01-2013, 06:00 AM
RE: Performance - by Abnormality - 02-02-2013, 10:58 PM
RE: Performance - by blazer - 02-02-2013, 03:41 PM
RE: Performance - by epixoip - 02-02-2013, 11:22 PM
|
