11-07-2011, 03:28 PM
Yes, it's evident from the stats that oclhashcat-plus is more optimized than oclhashcat. So, to reiterate my question:
What's the reason behind the better performance of oclhashcat-plus over oclhashcat? Just a few technical details (if possible?)
Is it possible to have the same optimization in oclhashcat for a mask attack too?
What's the reason behind the better performance of oclhashcat-plus over oclhashcat? Just a few technical details (if possible?)
Is it possible to have the same optimization in oclhashcat for a mask attack too?