BruteForce Mode in SMF Hashes

[NeonFlash]

Is Bruteforce mode not available for SMF hashes?

Code:

oclHashcat-plus32.exe -m 121 -n 160 -a 3 --remove -o crackedSMF.txt Forum.txt ?l?l?l?l?l ?l?l?l?l

I get the usage error by oclHashcat-plus32.exe which prints out an error telling how to use it.

[M@LIK]

It does.
Use one mask at the end:

Code:

oclHashcat-plus32.exe -m 121 -n 160 -a 3 --remove -o crackedSMF.txt Forum.txt ?l?l?l?l?l

[NeonFlash]

Thank you. I was using the oclhashcat syntax.

---

Just to reconfirm. Does the concept of left and right masks no longer hold good?

I also noticed that the options such as:

-j
-k
--increment

are not available. They were quite useful.

[undeath]

yes, this is all correct. Increment mode will be available with the next version again.

[NeonFlash]

Hello,

Thanks for confirming. Would be great to see these options back.