Pure awesome,
your wish is granted!
Titan speeds:
Code:
Hash.Type......: TrueCrypt 5.0+ / PBKDF2-HMAC-RipeMD160 / AES
Speed.GPU.#1...: 81497 H/s
Hash.Type......: TrueCrypt 5.0+ / PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512 / AES
Speed.GPU.#1...: 38693 H/s
Hash.Type......: TrueCrypt 5.0+ / PBKDF2-HMAC-Whirlpool / AES
Speed.GPU.#1...: 10800 H/s
Hash.Type......: TrueCrypt 5.0+ / PBKDF2-HMAC-RipeMD160 boot-mode / AES
Speed.GPU.#1...: 163.0 kH/s
(05-17-2013, 05:56 PM)atom Wrote: [ -> ]I'm working on > length 15 support.
YEAH !!
7970 speeds:
Code:
Hash.Type......: TrueCrypt 5.0+ / PBKDF2-HMAC-RipeMD160 / AES
Speed.GPU.#1...: 116.7 kH/s
Hash.Type......: TrueCrypt 5.0+ / PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA512 / AES
Speed.GPU.#1...: 43745 H/s
Hash.Type......: TrueCrypt 5.0+ / PBKDF2-HMAC-Whirlpool / AES
Speed.GPU.#1...: 3572 H/s
Hash.Type......: TrueCrypt 5.0+ / PBKDF2-HMAC-RipeMD160 boot-mode / AES
Speed.GPU.#1...: 233.0 kH/s
Thanks for the benchmarks!
As I said, there was potential to improve the Whirlpool hash. I've just finished implementing it.
On my 2x hd6990 speed increased from 31 kHash/s to 49 kHash/s.
--
atom
you are genius as i said before
nobody can hide by this implementations..
also wish you success in passwordscon.
Is it me or is a titan faster than a 7970 at Whirlpool based on those results? If so, why?
(05-22-2013, 02:44 PM)Mangix Wrote: [ -> ]Is it me or is a titan faster than a 7970 at Whirlpool based on those results? If so, why?
orks and golems are also damn fast!
Nice work! Congratulations!
That's great news !!
Does this mean that it will be able to manage "pbkdf2_sha256$10000$" too, or am I talking idle ... ooops?
well, in theory - yes. in practice - no