hashcat Forum
Official Best64 Challenge Thread - Printable Version

+- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Misc (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-15.html)
+--- Forum: Organisation and Events (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-24.html)
+--- Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread (/thread-1002.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5


Official Best64 Challenge Thread - james123 - 03-22-2012

The Best64 Challenge

Compete to build a better best64.rule file!

Full information, submission and leader board;

http://beeeer.org/best64/


Updates:

22/Mar/2012 13:12 atom has taken the lead.
22/Mar/2012 16:02 undeath has stole the lead!
23/Mar/2012 06:16 james has taken the lead.
25/Mar/2012 19:13 frekvent came out of the blue and pwned us all
26/Mar/2012 14:36 james regained the lead
27/Mar/2012 11:17 frekvent is back for revenge! takes top place
27/Mar/2012 21:37 arex1337 is top

28/Mar/2012 20:00 contest over! arex1337 is the winner. see this post


RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread - atom - 03-22-2012

In fact, I would love to see it beaten. We will all benefit from it.

GOGOGOGO Guys!!



RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread - undeath - 03-22-2012

The script is not fair Sad

Code:
Recovered.: 21791/189667 hashes, 0/1 salts
Code:
2      undeath      21,267      11.21%      22/Mar/2012 15:17



RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread - james123 - 03-22-2012

Everything is working good now. Let the challenge continue!


RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread - blazer - 03-23-2012

hmm i want to play too but hashcat 0.38 seems to be giving me really odd results.

Eg i'm getting 8.3k hashes using the base list against the base hashes with no rules
getting 2k when the single : rule is used with the same baselist
and getting 5k when the normal base64 rule is used with the baselist

something doesn't seem right, could be just me.



RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread - restrictedbytes - 03-23-2012

(03-23-2012, 02:48 AM)blazer Wrote: hmm i want to play too but hashcat 0.38 seems to be giving me really odd results.

Eg i'm getting 8.3k hashes using the base list against the base hashes with no rules
getting 2k when the single : rule is used with the same baselist
and getting 5k when the normal base64 rule is used with the baselist

something doesn't seem right, could be just me.

i was going to ask the same thing... there's a weird "translation" also, in testing on my local machine, i get approx 6k found but when i upload rules to the form it says 18K found ???


RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread - undeath - 03-23-2012

version 0.38 has a buggy word processing. You need 0.39beta. (i assume this means only beta testers can participate)


RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread - restrictedbytes - 03-23-2012

(03-23-2012, 03:05 AM)undeath Wrote: version 0.38 has a buggy word processing. You need 0.39beta. (i assume this means only beta testers can participate)
non beta testers can participate, just wont have a chance at winning
Smile

so how does one become a beta tester....


RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread - oxaners - 03-23-2012

(03-23-2012, 03:49 AM)restrictedbytes Wrote:
(03-23-2012, 03:05 AM)undeath Wrote: version 0.38 has a buggy word processing. You need 0.39beta. (i assume this means only beta testers can participate)
non beta testers can participate, just wont have a chance at winning
Smile

so how does one become a beta tester....

I'm not a beta tester and am getting pretty close Tongue It just takes a bit more elbow grease and guesswork. You can use ocl to get a fairly accurate final number, then use .38 a few rules at a time for analysis.



RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread - atom - 03-23-2012

hashcat 0.39 released, now everybody can participate