![]() |
GTX 970 Benchmark - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Misc (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-15.html) +--- Forum: Hardware (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-13.html) +--- Thread: GTX 970 Benchmark (/thread-3982.html) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: GTX 970 Benchmark - TheJoSko - 01-16-2015 Upgrading to 346.22 and 1.32 seems to have resolved the cuStreamSynchronize errors I was seeing in 1.31 / 343.22 when overclocking. Tuned workload profile and the following overclock: Code: nvidia-settings -a [gpu:0]/GPUGraphicsClockOffset[3]=250 /cudaHashcat-1.32/cudaHashcat64.bin -w 3 --remove -o /Hashes.cracked -m 5600 -r /cudaHashcat-1.32/rules/best64.rule /Hashes.txt /mega2.txt Hash.Type......: NetNTLMv2 Speed.GPU.#1...: 257.9 MH/s Speed.GPU.#2...: 258.2 MH/s Speed.GPU.#*...: 516.1 MH/s RE: GTX 970 Benchmark - epixoip - 01-16-2015 best64.rule is not enough rules to gain full acceleration. try using d3ad0ne.rule or rockyou-30000.rule RE: GTX 970 Benchmark - TheJoSko - 01-17-2015 (01-16-2015, 08:30 PM)epixoip Wrote: best64.rule is not enough rules to gain full acceleration. try using d3ad0ne.rule or rockyou-30000.rule Thanks epixoip. With 150 clock offset and d3ad0ne.rule I am seeing: Hash.Type......: NetNTLMv2 Speed.GPU.#1...: 294.4 MH/s Speed.GPU.#2...: 291.9 MH/s Speed.GPU.#*...: 586.3 MH/s Bump it up to 200 offset and I get: Hash.Type......: NetNTLMv2 Speed.GPU.#1...: 302.4 MH/s Speed.GPU.#2...: 302.4 MH/s Speed.GPU.#*...: 604.8 MH/s Bump it up to 250 offset and I get: Hash.Type......: NetNTLMv2 Speed.GPU.#1...: 309.8 MH/s Speed.GPU.#2...: 309.6 MH/s Speed.GPU.#*...: 619.4 MH/s ... ERROR: cuStreamSynchronize() 714 I guess 200 is the sweet spot for these cards. |