R9 290 vs 290x pricing and reference design questions - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Misc (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-15.html) +--- Forum: Hardware (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-13.html) +--- Thread: R9 290 vs 290x pricing and reference design questions (/thread-5803.html) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: R9 290 vs 290x pricing and reference design questions - bubblehash - 09-13-2016 So I did a default install of Ubuntu Server LTS 14.4(.4), only installed: Code: build-essential dkms fluxbox libqtcore4 libc6-i386 lib32gcc1 xserver-xorg xserver-xorg-core xserver-xorg-input-evdev xserver-xorg-video-dummy x11-xserver-utils xdm Code: $ uname -a After rebooting, I installed the drivers listed in the thread above (the 15.12), successfully ran aticonfig --initial, and they appear to be in place: Code: ~$ dpkg --get-selections | grep fglrx My ATI Radeon 290x is detected in hardware: Code: $ lspci | grep VGA But for some reason the kernel never loads (doesn't have??) the actual fglrx module: Code: $ sudo clinfo A similar error from Xorg.log: Code: $ cat Xorg.0.log | grep fglrx I did notice this in my /etc/X11/xorg.conf though which seems off given that lscpi shows an address of 83:00.0: Code: ... Why are my kernel modules missing and how to I get them to load? RE: R9 290 vs 290x pricing and reference design questions - kartan - 09-14-2016 check if the module is loaded root@ultrabox:/home/kartan/hashcat# lsmod |grep fglrx fglrx 15405056 38 amd_iommu_v2 20480 1 fglrx Edit: yea your clinfo error indicates that your module is not loaded, try to rebuild it with "--force". Btw did you take a look at https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=linux_server_howto RE: R9 290 vs 290x pricing and reference design questions - bubblehash - 09-14-2016 (09-14-2016, 03:14 AM)kartan Wrote: check if the module is loaded That was the exact link I followed, but I opted to use the proprietary drivers for 15.12 mentioned in the thread above. I'll try my dpkg install with force FWIW to see if that helps. I didn't get any errors when the drivers were installed and aticonfig seemed to work ok. RE: R9 290 vs 290x pricing and reference design questions - bubblehash - 09-14-2016 yea your clinfo error indicates that your module is not loaded, try to rebuild it with "--force". Btw did you take a look at https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=linux_server_howto [/quote] That was the exact link I followed, but I opted to use the proprietary drivers for 15.12 mentioned in the thread above. I'll try my dpkg install with force FWIW to see if that helps. I didn't get any errors when the drivers were installed and aticonfig seemed to work ok. [/quote] Same error - it won't load/can't find the kernel mod. lsmod doesn't show it, and even with a --force all with dpkg, it still never loads the module. I feel like all this needs is a symlink somewhere from the actual driver to where the system expects to find it. RE: R9 290 vs 290x pricing and reference design questions - kartan - 09-14-2016 I was talking about rebuilding the module not reinstalling the package RE: R9 290 vs 290x pricing and reference design questions - bubblehash - 11-28-2016 (09-14-2016, 08:32 PM)kartan Wrote: I was talking about rebuilding the module not reinstalling the package Hmmm well I keep trying it but I always get this: Building initial module for 4.4.0-47-generic Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 4.4.0-47-generic (x86_64) Consult /var/lib/dkms/fglrx-core/15.201/build/make.log for more information. Which looks like it fails for some other reason. Note this time I simply did an 'apt-get install fglrx' p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 13.0px Monaco; color: #f5f5f5; background-color: #000000} span.s1 {font-variant-ligatures: no-common-ligatures} DKMS make.log for fglrx-core-15.201 for kernel 4.4.0-47-generic (x86_64) Sun Nov 27 19:02:26 EST 2016 /usr/sbin/dkms: line 73: cd: /var/lib/dkms/fglrx/15.201/build: No such file or directory AMD kernel module generator version 2.1 doing Makefile based build for kernel 2.6.x and higher rm -rf *.c *.h *.o *.ko *.a .??* *.symvers make -C /lib/modules/4.4.0-47-generic/build SUBDIRS=/var/lib/dkms/fglrx-core/15.201/build/2.6.x modules make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-4.4.0-47-generic' CC [M] /var/lib/dkms/fglrx-core/15.201/build/2.6.x/firegl_public.o /var/lib/dkms/fglrx-core/15.201/build/2.6.x/firegl_public.c: In function ‘firegl_major_proc_read’: /var/lib/dkms/fglrx-core/15.201/build/2.6.x/firegl_public.c:639:9: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be len = seq_printf(m, "%d\n", major); ^ /var/lib/dkms/fglrx-core/15.201/build/2.6.x/firegl_public.c: In function ‘KCL_fpu_save_init’: /var/lib/dkms/fglrx-core/15.201/build/2.6.x/firegl_public.c:6508:49: error: ‘XSTATE_FP’ undeclared (first use in this function) if (!(fpu->state.xsave.header.xfeatures & XSTATE_FP)) ^ /var/lib/dkms/fglrx-core/15.201/build/2.6.x/firegl_public.c:6508:49: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in /var/lib/dkms/fglrx-core/15.201/build/2.6.x/firegl_public.c: At top level: /var/lib/dkms/fglrx-core/15.201/build/2.6.x/firegl_public.c:6498:12: warning: ‘KCL_fpu_save_init’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] static int KCL_fpu_save_init(struct task_struct *tsk) ^ make[2]: *** [/var/lib/dkms/fglrx-core/15.201/build/2.6.x/firegl_public.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [_module_/var/lib/dkms/fglrx-core/15.201/build/2.6.x] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-4.4.0-47-generic' make: *** [kmod_build] Error 2 build failed with return value 2 RE: R9 290 vs 290x pricing and reference design questions - atom - 11-29-2016 You need amdgpu-pro 16.40 for kernel 4.4 |