![]() |
You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Deprecated; Ancient Versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-46.html) +--- Forum: Very old oclHashcat-plus Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-23.html) +--- Thread: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons (/thread-2030.html) |
RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons - undeath - 02-06-2013 all in all the performance is ok. you can tweak --gpu-loops and -n to get some improvement. RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons - Wolf_Blitzer - 02-07-2013 (02-04-2013, 11:23 AM)crysis Wrote: .. well thats right.. looks like ATI cards gets underpriced compared with Nvidia, when second hand.. (02-06-2013, 11:19 PM)undeath Wrote: all in all the performance is ok. you can tweak --gpu-loops and -n to get some improvement. Thanks, undeath. After playing with those settings, this is my first attempt at speeding it up. Also, if this discussion (which has changed, sorry) belongs in another area of the forum, I apologize. Code: Session.Name...: oclHashcat-plus It -never- went under 71k/s the entire 15 minutes. Sometimes it was more, sometimes it was like 71,009/s... but it was definitely a bit faster using the following options. Code: --gpu-accel=32 --gpu-loops=256 Now, I may be using those options wrong... but they did seem to work. RE: You need -exactly- Catalyst v13.1 for very good reasons - Hash-IT - 02-07-2013 Try -n 80 -u 4096 for WPA, I find that works best for me. |