![]() |
oclHashcat-plus v0.09 - Printable Version +- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum) +-- Forum: Deprecated; Ancient Versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-46.html) +--- Forum: Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-19.html) +--- Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 (/thread-1541.html) |
RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 - forumhero - 09-10-2012 thanks, atom. one more question. are the computing nodes able to recover from a crash and pickup where it left off? it would suck to restart hashcat if a single node failed. as more and more machines are added to the cluster, it also increase the chances of failure. RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 - pragmatic - 09-11-2012 Awesome work, thanks atom! RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 - atom - 09-11-2012 (09-10-2012, 06:48 PM)forumhero Wrote: thanks, atom. Never tried before, but I would say no. RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 - TerribleIdea - 09-11-2012 Amazing work as always. Very happy to read this post ![]() Thanks once again Atom! TI RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 - perlish - 09-19-2012 amazing ! thank you Atom! RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 - pamamolf - 10-08-2012 Does v0.09 support the Asus HD7970 card? Thank you RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 - atom - 10-08-2012 (10-08-2012, 04:44 PM)pamamolf Wrote: Does v0.09 support the Asus HD7970 card? yes RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 - Arrow - 10-08-2012 This is amazing work. Option for mixed card setups will be more than welcome ![]() RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 - chicago-guy - 10-26-2012 Just started using v0.09. Great set of new features! Nicely done. Perhaps I'm comparing apples with oranges, but using 'oclHashcat-plus64.bin -m 2500', I've experienced a reduction in speeds between v.0.08 and v.0.09. I'm using the same hccap file and am running a straight dictionary attack with no special options. I'm using two HD 7970's and the speeds have dropped from ~290K to ~200K. Many thanks. RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.09 - M@LIK - 10-26-2012 atom Wrote: Default workload settings have been changed to reduce desktop lags. You can re-adjust by settings --gpu-loops 4096 -n 32 or so by hand. |