+- hashcat Forum (https://hashcat.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Deprecated; Ancient Versions (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-46.html)
+--- Forum: Very old oclHashcat-plus Support (https://hashcat.net/forum/forum-23.html)
+--- Thread: 320.00 - faster for cudaHhashcat? (/thread-2269.html)
320.00 - faster for cudaHhashcat? - Mangix - 04-28-2013
I got my friend to run a .bat file that I set up to see whether or not I was delusional about the increase in speed but here are his results:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/102011983/hashcat/314.07.png
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/102011983/hashcat/320.00.PNG
The driver version is in the file name. It was also the only thing changed.
As I have a GTS 450, my numbers are close though lower.
RE: 320.00 - faster for cudaHhashcat? - atom - 04-28-2013
WOW, I can verify this on my gtx560Ti.
Speeds increased drastically on 319.12 beta on Linux, too.
MD5: 1657 -> 1817 = +9.65%
SHA1: 425 -> 596 = +40.23%
SHA256: 150 -> 229 = +52.66%
SHA512: 61897 -> 70519 = +13.92%
Oracle: 69508 -> 72086 = +3.7%
All for free, I wont say no
Wondering where this is coming from. Did they internally enable funnelshift for < sm_35? Its possible since its the algorithms that using rotates alot seems to gained the most speed.
Going to analyze this.
RE: 320.00 - faster for cudaHhashcat? - Rolf - 04-28-2013
Rolf aint impressed.
GTX Titan and GTX 480.
RE: 320.00 - faster for cudaHhashcat? - atom - 04-28-2013
So we can be sure now, This is about sm_21.
RE: 320.00 - faster for cudaHhashcat? - 2Fac3 - 04-28-2013
I knew something had to be up with the nvida vs ati crack speeds. https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-2181.html one driver update and 50-60% bump in speed. Still about 1/3 as fast but at least its a little more in proportion.