|
rule bug in oclHashCat-plus?
|
|
06-27-2012, 12:47 PM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
|
rule bug in oclHashCat-plus?
Hi, I'm trying to understand the rules, and while reading some, I saw this in the file rules/best64.rule:
Code: ## high frequency overwrite at startSurely the last entry here is wrong? There's no point replacing the first character first with a t, and then replacing that with a b again? |
|||
|
06-27-2012, 12:50 PM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: rule bug in oclHashCat-plus?
It's not a bug, it's a feature.
|
|||
|
06-27-2012, 01:02 PM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: rule bug in oclHashCat-plus?
I think the description is wrong in rules/specific.rule too:
Code: ## rule: switch last two chars of word with each otherbut I think it switches the first two chars, not the last two. To switch the last two chars, the k in the rules should have been capitalized. Also, I didn't see any documentation of the '>' in docs/rules.txt, but I assume this is a test meaning we should continue only if the length of the input string is equal to or greater than A (10). Does it in fact mean greater or equal, or strictly greater? The first sounds confusing, in my opinion it ought to be the latter. |
|||
|
06-27-2012, 04:49 PM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: rule bug in oclHashCat-plus?
You are absolutly right, but somebody already reported this on IRC, so i fixed it for the betas. In the next release it will be fixed.
|
|||
|
06-27-2012, 05:26 PM
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: rule bug in oclHashCat-plus?
Does that cover the issue from rules/specific.rule as well? And does the '>' mean >= or just >?
|
|||
|
06-28-2012, 09:55 AM
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: rule bug in oclHashCat-plus?
Easiest way to find out is to use hashcat in --stdout mode:
Quote:root@sf:~/hashcat-0.40# cat dict |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Search
Member List
Calendar
Help





