|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[asc]
|
| |
|
Thread: Rules in 16800 don't work?
Post: RE: Rules in 16800 don't work?
|
philsmd Wrote: (06-30-2020, 11:10 AM)
--
it's exactly like undeath explained above.
Without the -S slow mode the passwords that are too short (from the dict) are rejected immediately, while the -S m... |
|
FinPeter |
General Talk
|
8 |
15,281 |
06-30-2020, 11:35 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Rules in 16800 don't work?
Post: RE: Rules in 16800 don't work?
|
atom Wrote: (06-30-2020, 10:16 AM)
--
instead of using:
Code:
--
hashcat -a 0 -m 16800 test.hash word.dict -r test.rule
--
you can also use:
Code:
--
hashcat -a 0 -m 16800 test.hash w... |
|
FinPeter |
General Talk
|
8 |
15,281 |
06-30-2020, 10:46 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Rules in 16800 don't work?
Post: RE: Rules in 16800 don't work?
|
undeath Wrote: (06-30-2020, 10:07 AM)
--
I expect your password is not actually WORD123 but something different. Because WORD123 is only seven characters and thus not a valid WPA2 password.
WPA2 h... |
|
FinPeter |
General Talk
|
8 |
15,281 |
06-30-2020, 10:41 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Rules in 16800 don't work?
Post: Rules in 16800 don't work?
| This is strange, is there a bug or am I missing something here:
Let's say password is WORD123. I have following files:
test.hash containing single hash (16800) of the password
test.rule contain... |
|
FinPeter |
General Talk
|
8 |
15,281 |
06-30-2020, 09:54 AM |
