|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[asc]
|
| |
|
Thread: Benchmark compare algorithms
Post: RE: Benchmark compare algorithms
| 5 for historical reasons ow oke, thanks a lot :) |
|
raltszork |
General Help
|
6 |
21,306 |
03-11-2016, 04:14 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Benchmark compare algorithms
Post: RE: Benchmark compare algorithms
|
epixoip Wrote: (03-11-2016, 03:51 PM)
--
Hmm, I'm not sure you fully understand what's happening here. The benchmark for 'SHA-512' is for the literal SHA-512 algorithm. If you want to see an iterated... |
|
raltszork |
General Help
|
6 |
21,306 |
03-11-2016, 04:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Benchmark compare algorithms
Post: RE: Benchmark compare algorithms
| Oke thank you for your answer.
Is there any reason why these values were choosen?
If there is no value like SHA-512 for example, there is just 1 iteration right? |
|
raltszork |
General Help
|
6 |
21,306 |
03-11-2016, 03:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Benchmark compare algorithms
Post: Benchmark compare algorithms
| Hi everyone,
This might be a less intellegent question, in that case I am sorry ;)
I would like to know how the benchmarking option can be used to compare the algorithms
or if there is an other... |
|
raltszork |
General Help
|
6 |
21,306 |
03-11-2016, 12:33 PM |
