|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[asc]
|
| |
|
Thread: why Hashcat v6.2.5 is slower than v5.1.0
Post: RE: why Hashcat v6.2.5 is slower than v5.1.0
| I managed to run Hashcat v6.2.5 on Linux.
For simplicity, I run Ubuntu directly from a USB stick without installing it on a hard disk.
I chose Ubuntu because it is recommended by Hashcat team.
http... |
|
v71221 |
hashcat
|
19 |
6,327 |
03-28-2022, 12:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Example hash for DES 14000 does not crack correctly.
Post: RE: Example hash for DES 14000 does not crack corr...
| my laptop is not too fast, so I tried to narrow keyspace.
hashcat1 is there. You can play with different combinations.
Code:
--
C:\hashcat-6.2.5-207>hashcat.exe -a 3 -m 14000 "a28bc61d44... |
|
v71221 |
hashcat
|
11 |
2,800 |
03-02-2022, 09:23 AM |
| |
|
Thread: How to crack a bcrypt hash with salt?
Post: RE: How to crack a bcrypt hash with salt?
|
royce Wrote: (03-02-2022, 12:38 AM)
--
hashcat detects and uses the salt automatically.
--
For all hash-modes ? or only for 3200 ?
So, you don't need to pass the salt to Hashcat, even if you know... |
|
v71221 |
hashcat
|
3 |
1,165 |
03-02-2022, 08:19 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Example hash for DES 14000 does not crack correctly.
Post: RE: Example hash for DES 14000 does not crack corr...
| Why are you using v6.2.2
The latest version is v6.2.5
You can also try the beta version from https://hashcat.net/beta
Code:
--
C:\hashcat-6.2.5>hashcat.exe -a 3 -m 14000 "a28bc61d44bb81... |
|
v71221 |
hashcat
|
11 |
2,800 |
03-02-2022, 07:32 AM |
| |
|
Thread: why Hashcat v6.2.5 is slower than v5.1.0
Post: [Solved] why Hashcat v6.2.5 is slower than v5.1.0
| Hooray :)
I found this link
*ttp://registrationcenter-download.intel.com/akdlm/irc_nas/vcp/13794/opencl_runtime_18.1_x64_setup.msi
Now it takes only 11 seconds instead of 16 minutes.
Thank you... |
|
v71221 |
hashcat
|
19 |
6,327 |
02-28-2022, 05:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat v6.2.0
Post: RE: hashcat v6.2.0
| @atom
Could you kindly explain why initializing of Hashcat v6.2.5 takes so long time (about 16 minutes, in my case).
v5.1.0 is much faster on the same laptop.
Yes, I understand that my laptop is no... |
|
v71221 |
hashcat
|
41 |
72,835 |
02-27-2022, 08:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Low hashrate with GTX 1650 when using CUDA
Post: RE: Low hashrate with GTX 1650 when using CUDA
| Hello,
I also observe too long initializing of Hashcat v6.2.5
I waited about 16 minutes.
Please see https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-10548.html |
|
v71221 |
Hardware
|
2 |
3,502 |
02-27-2022, 08:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Need some questions answ0ered
Post: RE: Need some questions answ0ered
| Google is your friend. Or try built-in search.
https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Ahashcat.net%2Fforum+%22how+to+attack+a+specific+ap%22
https://hashcat.net/forum/search.php
When you read this... |
|
v71221 |
hashcat
|
1 |
654 |
02-26-2022, 10:28 AM |
| |
|
Thread: why Hashcat v6.2.5 is slower than v5.1.0
Post: RE: why Hashcat v6.2.5 is slower than v5.1.0
| @pdo
@Snoopy
Thank you for reply.
Yes, requirement for Hashcat v6.2.5
Intel CPUs require this runtime:
"OpenCL Runtime for Intel Core and Intel Xeon Processors" (16.1.1 or later)
However, th... |
|
v71221 |
hashcat
|
19 |
6,327 |
02-24-2022, 10:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: why Hashcat v6.2.5 is slower than v5.1.0
Post: RE: why Hashcat v6.2.5 is slower than v5.1.0
| Yes, it seems so. But as a user I only care about the total running time. Why is this time significantly longer for hashcat v6.2.5 than for v5.1.0 ? |
|
v71221 |
hashcat
|
19 |
6,327 |
02-22-2022, 09:40 PM |
| |
|
Thread: why Hashcat v6.2.5 is slower than v5.1.0
Post: RE: why Hashcat v6.2.5 is slower than v5.1.0
| As for the --force option, you are absolutely right. However, in my case it works and gives the expected result.
Code:
--
C:\hashcat-5.1.0>hashcat64.exe -D 2 --force -a 3 -m 16800 "ca5396... |
|
v71221 |
hashcat
|
19 |
6,327 |
02-22-2022, 08:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: why Hashcat v6.2.5 is slower than v5.1.0
Post: RE: why Hashcat v6.2.5 is slower than v5.1.0
| @Snoopy
Thank you for reply.
Simplicity is the reason for -a 3 (BruteForce) instead of -a 0 (Wordlist).
This way you can enter the password directly into the command line.
With -a 0 you need, fi... |
|
v71221 |
hashcat
|
19 |
6,327 |
02-22-2022, 07:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat "not enough allocatable device memory for this attack"
Post: RE: hashcat "not enough allocatable device memory ...
| @chadou
You can try to use previous versions of Hashcat, not the latest.
Please see https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-10548.html |
|
v71221 |
hashcat
|
4 |
3,446 |
02-21-2022, 10:40 AM |
| |
|
Thread: illegal hardware instructions
Post: RE: illegal hardware instructions
| on Windows it is possible to use Intel GPU with Hashcat v5.1.0 using option -D 2 --force
Please see https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-10548.html
@Snoopy
Please share your opinion why Hashcat v6.2.... |
|
v71221 |
hashcat
|
8 |
2,392 |
02-21-2022, 10:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Intel Integrated GPU
Post: RE: Intel Integrated GPU
| on Windows it is possible to use Intel GPU with Hashcat v5.1.0 using option -D 2 --force
Please see https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-10548-post-54363.html |
|
v71221 |
Hardware
|
8 |
12,409 |
02-21-2022, 09:56 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hcxtools - solution for capturing wlan traffic and conversion to hashcat formats
Post: RE: hcxtools - solution for capturing wlan traffic...
| I found that probably the easiest way for newbies to run hcxdumptool/hcxtools in Arch Linux is to use the Live USB.
Perhaps this should be mentioned in the README.md
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title... |
|
v71221 |
User Contributions
|
730 |
1,081,137 |
12-28-2021, 01:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hcxtools - solution for capturing wlan traffic and conversion to hashcat formats
Post: RE: hcxtools - solution for capturing wlan traffic...
| Hi, ZerBea!
Merry Christmas and all the best for the coming 2022.
It seems the last hcxdumptool commit is causing a segmentation fault.
Probably today's commit. Previous worked Ok.
Tested on the ... |
|
v71221 |
User Contributions
|
730 |
1,081,137 |
12-27-2021, 09:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: why Hashcat v6.2.5 is slower than v5.1.0
Post: why Hashcat v6.2.5 is slower than v5.1.0
| Hi, there! Is it normal? Was it expected? v6.2.5 is slower than v5.1.0
Not just slower, but about 200 times slower! Of course, with my specific hardware/software/hash.
I am new to Hashcat. I'm usi... |
|
v71221 |
hashcat
|
19 |
6,327 |
12-22-2021, 10:57 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hcxtools - solution for capturing wlan traffic and conversion to hashcat formats
Post: RE: hcxtools - solution for capturing wlan traffic...
| Hi, Zerbea!
Could you please answer.
Currently (December 2021), which chipsets/adapters are you testing hcxdumptool on?
Specifically, which 5GHz dongles are your favorite at the moment?
Thanks i... |
|
v71221 |
User Contributions
|
730 |
1,081,137 |
12-17-2021, 12:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Crack WPA2 (.hc22000 file) with list not completing
Post: RE: Crack WPA2 (.hc22000 file) with list not compl...
| @ZerBea
Here is more information about Windows, Hosted Network and PMKID.
I have found that
Windows 7 sends PMKID
Windows 8 sends PMKID
Windows 10 doesn't send
Windows 11 doesn't send
F... |
|
v71221 |
hashcat
|
15 |
9,171 |
12-15-2021, 02:01 PM |
