01-11-2013, 04:26 PM
(01-11-2013, 02:07 PM)atom Wrote: I'm impressed by you guys. This topic seems to be really important for you. So many discussions now and in the past... I'm currently working on other things. Once I finished them I will look again into longer plaintext support. Maybe up to 31.
Yay !
Thank you for listening to our requests atom. You commnets sound very much like a "Pending - Under Consideration" to me !!
I will add it to the apropiate section in the feature request wiki.
As WPA's speed is not decreased by longer passwords could there be a dynamic range in hashcat-plus per hash type ? WPA at 64 length support as there is no performance hit, but say for a hash that would suffer a hit drop down to 31 ?
Thanks !