increasing threads for stdout?
#6
the speed of --stdout has not changed. it helps to actually measure, rather than relying on perception.

0.44 without rules
Code:
epixoip@db:~/hashcat-0.44$ ./hashcat-cli64.bin --stdout ~/wordlists/rockyou.txt | pv -l >/dev/null
14.3M 0:02:57 [80.7k/s]

0.45 without rules
Code:
epixoip@db:~/hashcat-0.45$ ./hashcat-cli64.bin --stdout ~/wordlists/rockyou.txt | pv -l >/dev/null
14.3M 0:02:57 [80.7k/s]

0.44 with rules
Code:
epixoip@db:~/hashcat-0.44$ ./hashcat-cli64.bin --stdout ~/wordlists/top20k.txt -r rules/best64.rule | pv -l >/dev/null
1.66M 0:00:20 [81.1k/s]

0.45 with rules
Code:
epixoip@db:~/hashcat-0.45$ ./hashcat-cli64.bin --stdout ~/wordlists/top20k.txt -r rules/best64.rule | pv -l >/dev/null
1.66M 0:00:20 [81.0k/s]

since you are writing to a file, it would seem that your hard drive or filesystem is the bottleneck here, not hashcat.

also, it could be that the rules that you are testing are un-optimized and slow.


Messages In This Thread
increasing threads for stdout? - by Kgx Pnqvhm - 06-02-2013, 01:49 PM
RE: increasing threads for stdout? - by philsmd - 06-02-2013, 03:15 PM
RE: increasing threads for stdout? - by philsmd - 06-02-2013, 04:22 PM
RE: increasing threads for stdout? - by epixoip - 06-03-2013, 01:35 AM
RE: increasing threads for stdout? - by epixoip - 06-03-2013, 06:00 AM