Thanks for the reply- I will compare performance with a lower -n value. Would there be any value in going to VCL 1.21?
I noticed that I didn't mention this is a brute-force attack, by the way.
I guess that what I had read referred to the amount of bandwidth per GPU; with the latency that one gets on a standard gigabit switch, is it simply not reasonable to expect decent performance? Can I expect to get comparable performance to local over gigabit, or is it simply not going to happen (assuming a low -n value for now, will add RAM later to increase value)?
***EDIT***
Just tried with a -n of 80, getting ~1700K/sec through VCL and ~4000K/sec through local. Also, tried restarting the daemons and clock is still misreported.
Am I doing something wrong, or is this to be expected?
Thanks for your time...
I noticed that I didn't mention this is a brute-force attack, by the way.
I guess that what I had read referred to the amount of bandwidth per GPU; with the latency that one gets on a standard gigabit switch, is it simply not reasonable to expect decent performance? Can I expect to get comparable performance to local over gigabit, or is it simply not going to happen (assuming a low -n value for now, will add RAM later to increase value)?
***EDIT***
Just tried with a -n of 80, getting ~1700K/sec through VCL and ~4000K/sec through local. Also, tried restarting the daemons and clock is still misreported.
Am I doing something wrong, or is this to be expected?
Thanks for your time...