(02-13-2014, 09:59 PM)epixoip Wrote: Ah ok, yeah, that's more clear. So yes, you should file a bug report about this on Trac. Might also want to include the bug in my example as well, where it cracked "1234567" as "4321[76" (not just a display bug, has this in the potfile as well)
So, did you verify that indeed by having both hashes in the hash file oclhashcat fails on both?
Regarding your "4321[76" vs "1234567": for me it always writes in potfile "1234567". Can you please retry several times to confirm it always happens?
UPDATE: I opened a ticket