04-22-2015, 07:45 AM
Congratulations, Jeremi!
If the core clock during cracking process is indeed 1.215 GHz-ish, then my predictions in this thread were true.
On some algorithms, however, Titan X is performing better than expected (LM +76% vs 980).
NV did a good job by ditching FP64 and focusing solely on int performance.
Oh, and I expected Titan X to be hotter.
If the core clock during cracking process is indeed 1.215 GHz-ish, then my predictions in this thread were true.
On some algorithms, however, Titan X is performing better than expected (LM +76% vs 980).
NV did a good job by ditching FP64 and focusing solely on int performance.
Oh, and I expected Titan X to be hotter.