12-28-2015, 08:51 PM
Since I don't have access to the code base, I can only perform an educated guess.
The hash resembles plain sha512 algorithm, the salt is something like 104e8bd5-462f-4974-a508-f2963be9da75
I suspect the developer followed the logic of Drupal hashing and "improved" it.
Since I have a small-medium collection (24k hashes), I was thinking about trying to validate the hash using very common passwords (ie password, 123456) until a match is found. Then is business as usual
The hash resembles plain sha512 algorithm, the salt is something like 104e8bd5-462f-4974-a508-f2963be9da75
I suspect the developer followed the logic of Drupal hashing and "improved" it.
Since I have a small-medium collection (24k hashes), I was thinking about trying to validate the hash using very common passwords (ie password, 123456) until a match is found. Then is business as usual