Proper way of using --restore
#6
Ok, I'm now running with a larger dictionary and the restore point is updated to 1812480. So does this mean that my original dictionary is so small that it's not even enough for restore point to update?

If I use -s to resume, could it achieve the same effect? Since I don't get the restore point to update.


Messages In This Thread
Proper way of using --restore - by koallen - 09-10-2016, 03:16 PM
RE: Proper way of using --restore - by jodler303 - 09-10-2016, 03:31 PM
RE: Proper way of using --restore - by koallen - 09-10-2016, 03:43 PM
RE: Proper way of using --restore - by jodler303 - 09-10-2016, 04:01 PM
RE: Proper way of using --restore - by koallen - 09-10-2016, 04:14 PM
RE: Proper way of using --restore - by koallen - 09-10-2016, 07:53 PM
RE: Proper way of using --restore - by atom - 09-12-2016, 12:12 AM
RE: Proper way of using --restore - by koallen - 09-12-2016, 04:30 AM
RE: Proper way of using --restore - by atom - 09-12-2016, 08:42 AM