11-27-2016, 02:21 PM
Such an implementation wouldn't be hard to write, but slow in execution. But there's no reason to implement a slow solution, because if there's a faster alternative everyone would use the faster alternative.
If you think having a slow solution is better than no solution, then why not write it in you favourite language running on CPU. I think the answer is because it wouldn't run on GPU. So it turns out it's the performance you're looking for. Now you're in a loop my first argument.
A simple way to get out of this loop is by writing a specialized version of your hash. That's what we do in hashcat. Read this: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=fre...plish_this
If you think having a slow solution is better than no solution, then why not write it in you favourite language running on CPU. I think the answer is because it wouldn't run on GPU. So it turns out it's the performance you're looking for. Now you're in a loop my first argument.
A simple way to get out of this loop is by writing a specialized version of your hash. That's what we do in hashcat. Read this: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=fre...plish_this