hash160(x) a.k.a. ripemd160(sha256(x))
#7
(11-27-2016, 02:21 PM)atom Wrote: Such an implementation wouldn't be hard to write, but slow in execution. 
...
Now you're in a loop my first argument. 

Only if I accepted the claim about slow execution.
In a world, where OpenCL programs are compiled at runtime, I fail to see why an assembled processing pipeline in the source code should be slow in execution.

But never mind, I started to write my specialized code anyway.


Hash Misch


Messages In This Thread
RE: hash160(x) a.k.a. ripemd160(sha256(x)) - by hashmisch - 12-07-2016, 05:19 PM