05-10-2017, 10:13 PM
Thanks for your reply royce.
Your idea is not bad. But ideally, I'd like to have multiple instances running in parallel. I don't want to establish a timeframe a priori.
I have come up with a metric that gives me the likelihood of an attack mode cracking a hash given some training samples (I don't really want to get into the details of it because it could easily hijack the thread's main topic). My idea is to have one instance of hashcat for each attack mode, and to balance the workload proportionally to each likelihood.
Your idea is not bad. But ideally, I'd like to have multiple instances running in parallel. I don't want to establish a timeframe a priori.
I have come up with a metric that gives me the likelihood of an attack mode cracking a hash given some training samples (I don't really want to get into the details of it because it could easily hijack the thread's main topic). My idea is to have one instance of hashcat for each attack mode, and to balance the workload proportionally to each likelihood.